Frequently Asked Questions
a) QUESTION: ORTHODOX SCIENCE:
What aspect of science do orthodox scientists have to accept
to accept the paranormal?
'Transubstantiation' (the increasing and
decreasing of the 'speed' of energy)
is vital to understanding the paranormal. It is the bridge
between the natural and the supernatural, between the physical
and the super-physical. (Orthodox) science is concerned
mainly with the changing forms of energy. We are concerned
more with the substance of energy. It becomes possible to
dismantle the barrier between the natural and the supernatural,
the normal and the paranormal. Through substantiation, an
object could materialize or dematerialize. Dematerialization
is NOT dissolution. A dematerialized object would be invisible
and intangible. But it would be no less real than it was.
The object would simply have changed in substance to become
super-physical." (from SCIENCE OF THE GODS, David Ash
and Peter Hewitt)
b) WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE DIE? DIRECTLY FROM THE AFTERLIFE?
- By a highly credible source:
"After death ... we simply discarded our physical body
for ever, left it upon the earth, and taken up our life
in another and vastly superior world. The whole process
of transition which is so much feared by the folk on earth,
is a natural, normal and painless profess. It is as natural
and painless as removing your outer garment when you have
no further use for it. The world into which we have made
our entrance is a real world, solid and perpetually enduring.
The people who inhabit this spirit world are real people
of flesh and blood, people who once walked upon earth as
you do now ... " (This means- unlike what the Church
teaches - after we die we do NOT stay 6 feet underground
for thousands, perhaps millions of years - until we hear
Archangel Gabriel blowing his trumpet and wake us from
the 'dead to be judged'. We in fact continue to live on
crossing over.) (from HERE AND HEREAFTER, Mons Hugh Benson,
pictured left - former Catholic Church Monsignor - who saw
the 'light' when he crossed over - transmitted information
through medium Anthony Borgia).
c) QUESTION: Please accept this as a serious
question: is there sex in heaven? J.D. Los Angeles
Victor: Yes, highly credible
transmitted inoformation from the afterlife
dimension tells us there is sexual pleasure for those who
want it. Here is someone who claims to be from the higher
" ... The spirit body is composed of much finer stuff
than the physical body. It carries the ability to sense
pleasure only, not pain. The atoms which comprise the body
are farther apart than your physical counterpart. When two
entities desire to link up, to exchange sexual pleasure
energy, they merge, body to body. They become superimposed,
one with the other, and exchange energy and emotion from
one entire body to the other. Every cell interacts with
a cell from the other. This creates an all-consuming perception
of almost electrical or magnetic excitement and pleasure.
It is far beyond the orgasm you know, and it brings souls
together more intimately than is possible on your physical
plane. So folks here have fun, too. (from BEYOND THE VEIL,
d) QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME INTRODUCTORY BOOKS WE
READ TO LEARN ABOUT CONDITIONS IN THE AFTERLIFE?
What is really critical is studying what is being transmitted
from the afterlife by reliable high sources.
Highly recommended transmissions from the
* all of the Silver Birch books,
* all of the books by Hugh Benson (medium was Anthony Borgia)
Anthony Borgia - Life In The World Unseen
Anthony Borgia - More About Life In The World Unseen
Anthony Borgia - Facts
* the books of Arthur Findlay where he includes information
directly from the afterlife, such as
On the Edge of the Etheric.
These books will give you an introduction to what you need
to know about the afterlife - your inevitable future.
For more classic afterlife books see Ghostcircle ebooks.
e) QUESTION: The
Christian Church tells that that we are made in the 'image
of God'. Does that mean God looks like a human being? If
not, what kind of a body are we going to have when we cross
over to the afterlife dimension?
Victor: First, 'God' does
NOT look like a human being. God is what some
have stated to be the 'ultimate supreme energy' which means
'God' does not have a body or form. We humans on earth take
the form of a physical human being - because it is through
matter that the spirit will be able to continue to make
spiritual advancement. We will have a physical body on earth
and even in the afterlife until we learn all spiritual lessons
we can when we have a physical body. But there will come
a time that when we spiritually progress, when we have exhausted
all the potential spiritual learnings, we would not need
the form of a human being. We then become a 'being of light'
where we still have memories, character and become far more
powerful as a 'being of light.'
f) WHY IS IT THAT SOME PEOPLE GET BETTER RESULTS
THAN OTHERS IN ITC AND EVP?
Victor: My view is that
there are at least two possible reasons for that:
first, those experimenters in Instrumental Communication
(ITC) and electronic voice phenomena (EVP) may be more mediumistic
and have more ectoplasm in their body. Ectoplasm helps to
amplify the voice sounds from the afterlife. Secondly, we
know that dedication and harmony within a group and a strong
connection with someone in the spirit world are important
ingredients. My view is that when ITC is perfected, it will
cause a revolution in the acceptance of the afterlife. Imagine
watching, at will, loved ones who crossed over who appear
on a screen responding to our questions. In a modified form
this impressive afterlife phenomenon is happening now in
Brazil with Sonia Rinaldi. See our summary on ITC.
g) QUESTION: THE DEATH SENTENCE: Victor,
I have campaigned a long time against the death penalty.
What is your position? Best Regards, John, Canada
Victor: Good question John.
The information I get about anything spiritual
usually comes directly from some highly credible source
from the afterlife – that’s my authority. Silver
Birch whom I regard as a very highly credible source, states
that it is wrong for the State to have the death penalty.
It’s all right for killers to spend their life in
prison for murder. It just may be that in time they will
realize what they did and learn their lesson. But the reasons
some people become killers are very complex. So, he says,
if we kill murderers here, the problem is shifted to the
afterlife. Killers sent to the afterlife have the ‘freedom’
to roam the dark astral level closest to earth to influence
those still living and cause trouble.
h) QUESTION: ADDICTIONS:
"My partner who died recently was extremely affected
by addiction to cigarettes. Could that be a problem for
addictions carry on in the afterlife. This means
that those who are addicted to tobacco, alcohol and drugs
would still exist. There have been reports of clairvoyants
watching someone in a hotel drinking alcohol who see spirits
trying to get some vicarious enjoyment by moving into their
auras. Transmitted information directly from the afterlife
also tells us that 'lower' spirits addicted to sex could
interfere with some humans here on earth. A couple of females
got in touch with me complaining that they felt strong sexual
sensation as if a physical person was there when going to
sleep in bed. This has also been confirmed by afterlife
researcher Dr Kubler Ross. But there will always be help
in the afterlife for those who are addicted who want help.
There are special places in the afterlife where all kinds
of addictions are dealt with effectively.
i) QUESTION ON EVIDENCE:
What evidence do you consider to be the best evidence for
the afterlife. Maggie, Hampstead, UK.
Victor: No doubt in my
mind, the most persuasive, the most convincing,
the most devastatingly reliable evidence in the world for
the afterlife is 'materialization' - of the type that I
have repeatedly witnessed with materialization medium David
Thompson (picture left shows David exuding ectoplasm for
afterlife intelligences to materialize). There very well
could be others like David, but my own experience with David
over the last seven years is one that I know no genius scientist
or genius materialist can rebut in any way whatsoever. For
years Wendy and I were present when David's main guide -'William'
- would become as solid as we are. For years we have witnessed
intelligences from the afterlife materialize and reunite
with their loved ones in the seance room. One day, when
people educate themselves about materialization, there will
be a revolution in the acceptance of the afterlife. Listen
as William claps his hands.
j) QUESTION - loopholes for a better
deal? : You said you'd be answering
my question to you in your report last time I saw you. As
we enter a New Year, could you, as someone who has been
researching the afterlife for over 23 years, tell us something
special you found - possibly a loophole - about the afterlife
to make it easier for us when we cross over? Jeremy, Santa
Victor: Hi Jeremy - good
question. Yes, over the many years researching the afterlife
has given me some insight into the best way to get a better
deal on crossing over. Guaranteed, helping others unselfishly
will significantly increase the vibrations of your spirit-body.
At all times keep away from cruelty and selfishness. Selfless
service will expand your consciousness and, on crossing
over, the cumulative level of vibrations of your spirit
body will automatically put you in a beautiful place. The
higher the vibrations in the afterlife dimension, the much
better conditions. That will be hugely more beneficial than
just going to a church service everyday! In fact, without
religious indoctrination your mind will not be encumbered
about what to expect. Think positively, help others, harmonize
your mind, body and spirit - and guaranteed you will maximise
your circumstances on crossing over.
k) WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DIE? ARTHUR
YENSEN'S NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCE
August of 1932, Arthur Yensen, a university graduate, geologist,
and staunch -materialist -turned -syndicated -cartoonist
was in a car accident and briefly died. His talks about
what he discovered often brought criticism, especially from
the church of the day. But there were those who would listen,
and as time wore on more and more people would ask him about
it. Finally in 1955, Arthur Yensen published a report of
his near-death experience in a booklet called "I Saw
Heaven". Kevin Williams has placed extracts on his
highly recommended near-death.com website. Read more...
l) WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DIE?
"Death is as easy and as simple
as going to sleep and then awakening. Our etheric-spirit
body slips out of the physical body, carrying the mind with
it, and we awake to our new surroundings to find our friends
and relations ready to help and instruct us in our new life.
Death is simply the severance of this etheric-spirit body
from the physical body. The physical (dead) body returns
to earth, and the etheric-spirit body, controlled by the
mind, continues to function in the afterlife ... We therefore
continue to exist as separate thinking units in the afterlife
etheric world, much as we do to-day here on earth, but with
new surroundings ..." (from the great psychic historian
Arthur Findlay's classic ON THE EDGE OF THE ETHERIC - Arthur
Findlay, pictured above, left)
QUESTION: Hey Victor, Tell me something,
when I die and go to the afterlife, am I going to rub shoulders
with thieves, murderers, rapists and other horrible people?
attracts like' is something which is strictly observed in
the afterlife. You will be among people who are at the same
level of spirituality - the same level of vibrations as
you have. If you are advanced spiritually, you will be surrounded
only with those who are advanced. Those you mentioned would
not likely to be spiritually advanced and are very likely
to be in the lower level of vibrations (level of spirituality)
that could accommodate their level of vibrations when they
cross over. As American George Meek said once, "There
are those who think that no matter how greedy, lazy, dissolute,
jealous, selfish, hateful and cruel a person may be in this
life, all such actions are forgiven, and a life of eternal
bliss awaits the saint and the sinner alike. As the evidence
shows, however, such thinking is totally unfounded."
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DIE: What
to do if you find yourself in total darkness on crossing
over - and how to get yourself in the realm of the light.
. Information transmitted from the other side tells
us that there are sometimes those
who cross-over from physical earth find themselves in complete
darkness in the afterlife. Usually this comes because of
ignorance about the afterlife and where death comes without
notice - or on rare occasions in suicides. Those who read
this Afterlife Report regularly will not find themselves
in that situation - but on rare occasions, if a person is
still doubting there could be some problems. However, the
remedy for that is really very easy. Just mentally call
for help. Yes, when you call for help you are directing
vibrations from your mind outwardly towards those whose
job it is to help those in trouble - the rescue team. Under
normal circumstances, the rescue team will take you to the
level of the Light. Our mind is just like a radio station
which has the ability to send and receive messages. It will
save eons of time in darkness. It's as easy as that. But
those in that condition must ask for help and help
will come. You will remember that.
o) QUESTION: Are
there opportunities in the afterlife dimension for service?
from the afterlife dimension, "Oh
far more than you face on earth. We have problems such as
you cannot possibly realise. We have to deal with millions
of souls in many parts of the spiritual universe- sick souls,
young souls, forgotten souls, lonely souls, malformed souls,
ignorant souls. Have we got problems! We have them because
you send them to our world... It is very hard for me to
convey to you what life in our world is really like. I speak
truthfully when I tell you that there is so much to explore
on this side. You have no knowledge of the infinite richness
of the life in the world of spirit. There is no beauty anywhere,
no majestic scenery, nothing you have visualised that can
compare in its grandeur and in its infinite variety to that
which can be seen in our world ..."
p) GREED AND POWER: Do
they exist in the afterlife dimension?
"Greed and power still
exist in what may be called the lower astral spheres.
What you must realise is that spiritually an individual
is exactly the same one day after death as he was before
it. Our world, unlike yours, is one where thought is reality.
What you think is real and substantial. The trouble is
that lust for power and greed chain them to earth. Though
materially dead, they are spiritually dead as well. They
are nearer to your world than they are to us. Unfortunately
they can harm those like themselves in your world who
are concerned only with greed and power." (S. Birch)
q) CAN YOU GUARANTEE
I WILL BE MEETING MY LOVED ONES WHEN I DIE? J. (N.Y.).
normal circumstances where there is a heart to heart
connection - say, between you and your loved ones, on
crossing over they will be meeting you to help you move
on to the realm of the light. As long as you are a reasonable,
open minded person - you do not have to be perfect here
on earth - yes, you will be meeting your loved ones on
crossing over. But, if a person happens to have a deep
belief that on dying nothing is going to happen or if
one lived a cruel, selfish life, there could be serious
problems meeting up with loved ones. That is the consistent
information we received over the decades about meeting
loved ones on crossing over.
WHAT'S YOUR VIEW WHEN SOMEONE WHO DID THE
WRONG THING AGAINST OTHERS CLAIMS HE WAS ONLY 'OBEYING
someone does 'wrong' - and KNOWS what he/she is
doing is wrong, then there will be a price to pay. For
example, the classic defense of those Nazis who were charged
with crimes against humanity at Nuremberg was 'I was
only obeying orders'.But international law did not
recognize that and many of those charged were executed
on the 16th October 1946 for crimes against humanity.
Interesting, the Court saw those charged as being part
of a 'criminal' political organization which murdered,
plundered, exterminated millions of people, invaded other
countries with criminal intent. But spiritually, if at
any time, a person - whether he/she is following orders
or not - is fully aware he/she is doing the wrong thing
than that person would have to pay a price for that pursuant
to the law of cause and effect.
QUESTION: Do you agree Victor that extraordinary
claims need extraordinary evidence?
First, don't fall for the skeptics' negative propaganda
the afterlife and the paranormal. As an expert in evidence
I can tell you absolutely that if one presents evidence
which is objective and repeatable even ordinary evidence
is sufficient. Don't forget the testimony of one reliable
witness is enough to send a person to jail for life.
Even in a case of murder all the police have to prove
is intention beyond reasonable doubt that the crime
was committed by the accused. Now if two video cameras
filmed a murderer killing a bank clerk in a robbery,
why would you need twenty video cameras (extraordinary
evidence) to prove that the murderer really shot the
clerk? One clear video would normally be sufficient
to convict. Extending the issue to afterlife communications
we need to ask what evidence there is to counter
the extraordinary store of evidence that has been collected
in every culture in the world over many millennia and
has been scientifically collated in repeatable experiments
over the last one hundred and fifty years.
Could you give me some idea what it is like in the afterlife?
Are we going to have friends, meet people, attend concerts,
go to libraries and have fun?
This is always a popular
question. But first, the information transmitted
from the afterlife about the conditions there come from
those who actually live there. So the evidence as to
what happens is absolutely solid. Under normal circumstances,
if you are the good average open minded honest person
- you do not have to be perfect - you will be met by
loved ones on crossing over. They will take you to the
level of the light where conditions are vastly superior
to what they are on earth. You do not have to work to
meet your commitments, you do not have to clean where
you stay - it will stay in perfect condition and clean
all the time; you do not have to eat or sleep, do not
have to wash anything, do not have physically exercise
to keep in shape, you do not have to shop, pay for anything
- all is free. You will have plenty of time to be with
your friends who are your spiritual equal, plenty of
time for concerts of your choice; you can go to entertainment
centers, libraries, lectures for self improvement in
the mind and spirit.Your level of fun will be consistent
with the spiritual level you have reached - the more
advanced you are, the more the fun!
But you are expected to make a selfless contribution
in some way. This contribution will be real pleasure
to do - so it is not really hard work as we know it
on earth. Guaranteed you will have a marvelous time!
u) QUESTION: You mentioned recently
the many different religions. It appears they all believe
that God exists - so really in many ways they are all
the same. Agreed? Voss, Birmingham.
Victor: Whilst most religions are more
or less the same - all saying that a Supreme
Being - a 'God' exists, the only religion that is different
from others is the religion of Spiritualism. This is
because the emphasis of Spiritualism is on proving that
the afterlife exists - and in all services they have
mediums contacting those from the other side to give
a message to any of those attending. Also, unlike Christianity
Islam - Spiritualism states that we, personally are
responsible for our own actions and omissions. This
means we receive in the afterlife what work and effort
we did on planet earth. This they say, has been confirmed
many times from those highly evolved spirit teachers
directly from the afterlife.
Q1. Why do you think the evidence for the afterlife
Answer: I equate 'objective' evidence with 'scientific'
evidence. When a formula can be duplicated over time and
space and you get the same results, that is being objective
or scientific. In the book I mention EVP, Instrumental Transcommunication
(ITC) and some twenty other psychic phenomena including
mediumship, out of body experiences and near death experiences
in which, when variables are held constant, the same results
Q2. Ought not the proven historical religious argument
be more persuasive than the information you have in your
Answer: No. This is because traditional religion
is purely subjective not scientific. For example, no one
can use science to prove that Jesus died for the ungodly.
It is universally accepted that anything 'subjective' is
itself subject to fundamental errors and to complete invalidation
that is why we have many different religions all claiming
they have the 'truth.' Further, with subjectivity you can
never ever have legitimate, objective 'authority.' Evidence
for the afterlife is now irretrievably objective. Whenever
there is an inconsistency between science and religion,
inevitably, science prevails, and will always prevail. The
classic example is the case of Galileo a conflict between
science and theology. Theology inexorably had to give way
Q3. Surely, you cannot argue against what is in the
Answer: If you read all the evidence I presented
you would have to agree that in fact psychic researchers
are giving scientific evidence for the existence of the
afterlife. It seems that conditions in the afterlife are
not 'standard' - i.e., there are gradations from the lowest
sphere to the highest. It is not unreasonable to state that
this is consistent with the Christian notion of hell and
purgatory (for the Catholics - the medium lower sphere)
and the upper spheres which can rightly be called 'heaven.'
But while there are darker, lower spheres, there is no such
thing as 'eternal hellfire' that was a concoction by an
unscrupulous ecclesiastic Biblical translators.
Q4. You said there is no such thing as eternal hellfire
- you're wrong. The Bible says there is.
Answer: You will find the English translation talking
about 'eternal hellfire' but NOT the original Greek version.
Deal with the original not the translations. For too many
centuries Christians were deliberately misled about eternal
damnation. Some devious Church writer deliberately and intentionally
mistranslated a critical word- 'eon.' You will find that
whenever 'eon' immediately preceded punishment in the Bible
such as hell, this Church translator erroneously and knowingly
mistranslated eon to mean 'eternal.' And elsewhere, whenever
the same word eon was used, the translator used eon to mean
what it truly means, 'a period of time' - in the time of
Jesus it was 100 years. Check for yourself. This wilful
mistranslation was a deliberate policy by the Church to
create unnecessary fear - see a very detailed explanation
of this and other deliberate Biblical mistranslations in
Communication with the Spirit World of God by J Greber
Q5. Why are some Christians hostile to Spiritualism?
Answer: Sheer ignorance. Most Christians - and I
do come from a Christian background myself -are sequacious
and accept theology blindly without investigating, without
trying to test anything for validity. They don't criticise
the teaching, the theology and allow themselves to be very
easily led. Blind faith is dangerous. But there are many
spiritualists who are Christians and others who embrace
many aspects of Christianity. For those brave Christians
who want to investigate, to know the truth about Christianity
I strongly recommend Arthur Findlay's The Rock of Truth,
Kersey Graves' The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviours,
Peter De Rosa's Vicars of Christ, the Rev Robert
Taylor's The Diegesis. Perceive the information with
equanimity and I will guarantee you dramatic spiritual transformation
Recent intolerance and unnecessary hostility: Spiritualists
and most people in the UK must have felt enormous disgust
at the disturbance by the Christian leaflet-waving Pentecostals
Nazi-like thugs who tried to disrupt a psychic meeting on
the Isle of Man. This particular Christian sect are people
who are ignorant about the genesis of Christianity, ignorant
of the fact that Christianity is a personal belief system,
ignorant about the objectivity of spiritualism and ignorant
about observing the ethics of tolerance of other people's
beliefs, values and empirically based information about
religion, psi and afterlife evidence.
Q6. What is the greatest problem for Christianity?
Answer: Very briefly, I believe that Pagan Mithraic
Sunworshipper Emperor Constantine, who initiated and was
to preside over the Council of Nicea in 325 AD is one of
the biggest problems. His influence brought a great deal
of unacceptable theological inconsistency and much intolerance.
Through him all 'Christian' spiritual writings had to conform
to the Council's decisions. This is important because he
influenced and paved the way for what was to eventually
be allowed to go in the Christian Bible. It was at this
Council that Jesus was turned into a God by violent lobbying
and by vote!
It is ironic in the extreme that someone who was not even
a Christian was the one who actually decided what fundamental
Christian theology would be about. The creed 'I Believe'
which is recited every day in many Christian services, was
originally composed at the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. The
Rev Robert Taylor in his Diegiesis (1977 reprint)
on page 348 states that Constantine, the founder of Christian
theology, is on historical record for, inter alia,
brutally murdering six members of his family, beheading
his own eleven year old son Crispus, throwing his own wife
Fausta into a bath of boiling water, also killing Maximian,
his wife's father, Bassianus, his sister Anastasia's husband,
Liciniaus, his nephew, Sopater his former spiritual advisor
and Licinius, his sister Constantina's husband. Pagan Emperor
Constantine was not baptised until just before he died in
333 AD circa. He was also influential in completing
the trend to ousting of psychic mediums from the temples.
These once-Mithraic temples were converted to Christian
churches by the Christians thereafter. Spiritualism is on
much safer grounds because of its objectivity whereas Christianity,
inevitably calls for blind faith.
Q7. Does it really make any difference whether one is
Christian or one is a Spiritualist?
Answer: I do not go for labels myself. A spiritual
person will always be a good person whether that person
is a Christian or a Spiritualist or anything else. The fundamental
difference is that whereas there are too many Christians
who wrongly believe that salvation is obtained by faith
alone. Spiritualists including Christian Spiritualists,
understand that doing selfless service and showing love
are more critical, more vital and more immediately directly
relevant than just unquestioning blind religious faith.
This very important evidence about what increases spirituality
comes directly from very highly accredited intelligences
such as Silver Birch, White Eagle and so many others. repeatedly
Q8. Have many sceptics applied for the million dollar
reward if they can rebut the evidence for the afterlife?
Answer: Oh yes, a few did. Whenever I inform them
what they have to do - rebutting mostly the objective evidence
I included in my book on the net, they do not write back.
A few academic sceptics complained that the test 'proving
beyond possible doubt' is impossible. Their claim is "nothing
is absolutely certain in this world." My reply is that
this is the test that the skeptics are demanding! And since
the cash reward is very high so must be the test of validity.
Besides, I stated, of course, there are certain things which
are absolutely certain in this world. For example, I made
the statement about the mortality of the human condition
-we humans physically die. One American Ph.D sceptic tried
to argue with me that no one can prove that!! I just replied,
if he could show me that President Kennedy is not dead,
or Princess Diana or Mother Theresa or Elvis Presley are
not dead, my sponsors will gladly hand over the million
Q9. You are making an offer which is impossible to prove
because 'you can't prove the negative'. Can you explain
Answer: I am NOT asking anyone to 'prove the negative.'
I received many emails from skeptics saying that - but they
themselves have not read my challenge - they read the website
of some skeptic who deliberately misled them about what
I have on my website. Then these skeptics waste my time
repeating what some other skeptic has deliberately misrepresented
about my offer.
If the reader goes to my home page - it is clearly expressly
stated that the challenge is about rebutting the 'EXISTING
EVIDENCE.' The evidence is in my book - click on the BOOK
on the homepage - you will then see the evidence which has
to be rebutted - chapters 3 to 24. Now, that is NOT proving
the negative. That is technical evidence which is admissible
in a court of law - all the way up to the Supreme Court
of the United States, the High Court of England and the
High Court of Australia and in all civilised countries in
the world. I state that only lawyers know what technically
constitutes admissible evidence. Check with your own lawyer.
That skeptical stage magician who has been disseminating
negative propaganda to fool the uninformed knows absolutely
NOTHING about laboratory experimentation and what constitutes
admissible technical evidence.
Q10. Have you ever had an afterlife experience?
Answer: Of course I have! In 1990 the psychic group
which was founded by Dr Fransesco Coll who was then based
in Washington DC was co-ordinating psychic groups in many
parts of the world. In one instance he showed me a technique
on how to contact intelligences from the other side. In
one workshop there were a 115 people. I interviewed many
of them and all stated they were communicating the same
way I was. Many of these people were highly intelligent
- many were teachers with university degrees, nurses, managers.
One of them was a stockbroker. I was the only lawyer. I
was there primarily to investigate if the technique could
be objectively demonstrated. It happened with some people
but not with others. Negative people exude too much negativity
to allow the free flow of positive energy to manifest. They
are allowing negative intervening variables to intrude and
disrupt otherwise positive results. This has been empirically
Q11. Is your research religious?
Answer: No, my research is scientific - NOT religious.
As I stated in my book, science is objective. This means
that if I give you a formula and this formula is used over
time and in different countries and from this formula you
get the same results - then that is scientific, that is
being objective. Religion is subjective; it is personal
beliefs unsupported by science. But whenever there is an
inconsistency between science and theology, inevitably,
science prevails. I give you every right to your personal
beliefs - it is a fundamental right. But go to my Chapter
1 Opening Statement for more details.
Q12. Is skepticism scientific?
Answer: Skepticism is NOT scientific! Skepticism,
like religion cannot be independently substantiated. A skeptic
may say, "I believe in nothing - but I cannot prove
that." This is because skepticism is subjective - anything
subjective is subject to complete invalidation. For more
information I refer you to my OPENING STATEMENT which is
chapter 1 in my book.
Q13. Why do people see psychic issues in a different
Answer: First this has to do with how much research
a person has done. Someone who has NOT done any research
will not be in position to know what is going on. For example,
if a person did a lot of research in medicine, obtained
qualifications and became a doctor then became a specialist
and now performs heart transplants, that person is certainly
more professional and more skilfully advanced in his field
than say, an academic or a stage magician or a clerk or
a tradesman or a manager. It is to do with depth of specialisation.
Q14. Why is it that some academics do not agree about
the existence of the afterlife or about psychic phenomena.
Answer: Yes, a few academics make it a career to
be against anything related to psychic phenomena. But there
are many academics allow for the existence of psychic phenomena
(psi). They do this to get promotion because they know that
some university sponsors are materialistic. So these academics
become subservient to the sponsors values' and keep obtaining
negative results in psi.
Q15. Why is it that highly educated academics continue
to obtain negative results?
Answer: First, if a professor does not do any research
about psychic phenomena, that professor will be ignorant
about psychic phenomena and will not have the authority
to make any comments on psi. Secondly, there is an experimental
term called, "the intruding negative variable.' This
means that when an academic experimenter or anybody else
who has a track record of negativity, the academic experimenter
actually influences the results to become negative. Empirical
evidence, in quantum physics validates this observation.
This is one of the grounds I cited why any applicant who
wants to apply for the skeptics alleged offer can never
beat the skeptics' challenge - see my article on why it
is impossible to win the skeptics' money offer - click on
SKEPTICS on the home page.
Q16. Why is it that no one has been able to beat the
Answer: This is because it is impossible to beat
the challenge. For full details see WHY NOBODY CAN WIN THE
SKEPTICS CHALLENGE - A LAWYER'S PERSPECTIVE go to homepage
and click on SKEPTICS.
Q17. What's the relevance of your many academic qualifications
to your claim of the validity for the afterlife?
Answer: first, my majors in Psychology from the
University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia gave
me highly complex skills in Scientific Method which is an
adjunct to three years in Psychology. As an investigator,
it is critical to be fully equipped with the expertise to
identify what is relevant, what is not. Those not qualified,
say, stage magicians, cannot conduct experiments properly
at a level where their conclusions could be valid.
Secondly, my qualifications and expertise in Law give me
a huge comparative advantage to professionally identify
what is admissible in evidence and what is not. Only litigation
lawyers know what is admissible evidence, not entertainers,
not magicians, not statisticians or other non qualified
Thirdly, a degree in Psychology gives me an advantage because
psychology has to do with professional assessment of the
mind, human behaviour, understanding different levels of
awareness and much more.
Because of my academic qualifications I was involved in
matters concerning intelligence in State police enforcement
- this immediately necessitated, refined and greatly expedited
my open minded skepticism (as distinct from closed minded
These university qualifications and my extensive professional
work give me a uniqueness to identify what to accept, what
Q19. So you believe in the afterlife?
Victor: I do not particularly believe in the afterlife.
I accept the evidence for the afterlife. I do not have the
luxury of beliefs because beliefs are personal, are subjective,
are not empirical, are not scientific. And any personal
belief, any subjective belief is itself subject to complete
invalidation. In other words, I accept the twenty three
areas of empirical evidence for the afterlife I researched
– see my book on the Net – www.victorzammit.com
Q20. How certain, how sure are you that the afterlife
V. Absolutely certain! I am absolutely sure, I am one hundred
per cent certain that when we humans physically die, we
cross over to the afterlife but our duplicate etheric body
– the spirit body - continues to exist. As I said,
this is not based on a belief or wishful thinking or religion
or superstition. My acceptance of the afterlife is primarily
based on my own experiences and the empirical, objective
Q21. What is this acceptance of the afterlife then
V: The most persuasive evidence is my own experience of
entities communicating with me through telepathy. I am clairaudient
– I can hear spirit voices telepathically –
clairaudient experiences I’ve had for the last sixteen
years. In addition, there are powerful afterlife experiment
and studies by world famous scientists – see second
chapter of my book about these scientists. There are also
others I know and trust who informed me that they had similar
afterlife experiences …
Q22. What other personal afterlife experiences
have you had?
V. Some sixteen years ago I studied psychic phenomena in
depth and was tutored by experts in mediumship. I became
clairaudient. My own father came through and after spending
some time authenticating who he was, I was satisfied beyond
any doubt that the contact was genuine. I asked questions
that only he and I knew about. But just let me qualify this:
I am intelligent, I am healthy in mind and body –
and we know that throughout history there have been a number
of people who were clairaudient. For example, Joan of Arc
Q23. This means you hear voices in the head?
V. Absolutely, even if it’s put rather bluntly but
… accurately. There are empirical studies in the Society
for Psychical Research which shows the empirical validity
of telepathy. Of course, telepathy means the transfer of
thoughts from mind to another mind on this planet earth
and from the afterlife dimension to earth. I suppose thoughts
can be voices in some way.
Q24. Have not there been cases where violent people
claim to have heard voices in the head?
V. That may be true because one has to ascertain who is
sending the voices. Voices that come from the afterlife
darker realm – which is a realm where mischievous
entities roam around do cause a lot of trouble on earth.
The voices and messages can come through electronic voice
phenomena, through instrumental trance-communication, the
ouija board or through mediumship. The example is similar
to you getting some obscene phone calls. But you may also
get phone calls from others who are not obscene or rude
or crude or offensive, but are sophisticated, more polite,
more refined, more knowledgeable.
Q25. Why is it that many people do not accept there
is an afterlife?
V. That’s very easily explained. These skeptics you
mentioned have not done any research on the paranormal.
As a matter of fact closed minded skeptics and debunkers
do not read paranormal information which gives them huge
anxiety if they have to read it. So they don’t. There
are of course the professional hard core skeptics with an
irretrievably closed mind who are on a crusade against those
who present the evidence for the afterlife and the paranormal.
For the open-minded person, there is more than enough evidence
to convince them that the afterlife and the paranormal exist.
Q26. What about those highly qualified, high profiled
scientists and psychologists in the skeptics’ organization
who keep on harping that there is no afterlife, no psi?
V. What I said earlier goes for them as well. The fact
is that if they could prove they are right, they would apply
to beat my one million dollars challenge I have on the Net.
But they haven’t. And they won’t. Most interesting
is that while there are hundreds of quality books written
about the reality and validity of the afterlife - these
books written by some of the most intelligent scientists
who ever walked on this planet earth - there is NOT one
book written by any of these materialist giants of science
who wrote a book giving reasons why the afterlife does not
or cannot exist.
Q27. How do you view religion then?
V. I do not interfere in people’s religious beliefs.
What they believe in is their business. My focus is on the
empirical – that is, using scientific method to measure
some psychic phenomena. But if some religious person tells
me that I am wrong, I ask him what objective evidence he
or she is citing to show that I am wrong. Incidentally,
in the last twenty years or so, no theologian or religious
person has ever asked me that. All agreed that religion
is subjective and science is objective.
Q28. How do you find the truth then?
V. As an empiricist and a lawyer with technical knowledge
of what technically constitutes admissible evidence I use
scientific method to get to the truth. If something is repeated
over time and space and yields the same results - keeping
variables constant - then I can state I found the truth.
To put it simplistically, 7+5=12 – that can never
be wrong. It is repeatable. But if you say to me that a
divorced Catholic is committing some heinous sin by remarrying
and will go to hell for eternity – that is something
which can never empirically be proved. In religious writings
there is nothing which is subject to empirical testing.
We get all the time, “you must have faith”.
But intelligent people from all credible universities around
the world will immediately tell you that faith is no authority
for objective truth. The only faith I would like to have
is when whatever I have faith in can be backed up empirically.
That I know I am dealing with the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth - and I can never be wrong, never!
Q29. What do you say to the reports that there
is a lot of inconsistent information coming from the otherside
V. That’s not difficult to explain. This is like
getting general information from a 10 year old and someone
with a university degree. In the afterlife there are different
realms from the lowest vibrating realm to the highest. The
lowest realm, the lower end of the Astral level is dark
with very low vibrations – some religionists people
call ‘hell.’ Then the realm of the light is
usually the third level where most decent folk end up after
their life on earth.
Q30. Where did you get this information about the
afterlife and why is that not a belief?
V. First, as I said earlier, anything which is empirically
repeated and gets the same results, I know I am dealing
with something substantive. Now the information about the
afterlife comes from mediumship. This mediumship has been
subject to empirical studies by empiricists – for
example, Prof Gary Schwartz and others. Besides, I also
had experiences to confirm what Prof Gary Schwartz empirically
tested. That is not a belief, that is empirical evidence
about the afterlife. The afterlife transmissions are most
critical because we get to know what exists in the afterlife
directly, by highly credible eye-witnesses, not by someone
who lived on earth some 2,000 years ago we do not know his
background, who he is or where he comes from.
Q31. Do you accept that people on earth will eventually
meet their loved ones who passed on?
V. Where there is a heart to heart link, it is guaranteed
that there will be a reunion when the one on earth eventually
crosses over to the afterlife dimension. Highly credible
information from the afterlife repeatedly stated that. Love
we are informed is the most powerful force in the universe
– and physical death can never sever the heart to
heart link, never. However, there are exceptions.
Q32. What exceptions?
V. First, let me state a scientific truism: for every action
there is an opposite and equal reaction. So it also happens
in spiritual physics. There is a consequence to everything
we do on earth. The soul gets higher vibrations through
interaction with other people, especially when we are unselfish,
fair, reasonable, just and equitable. But, if a person is
consistently cruel, selfish and even brutal, the soul’s
vibrations are automatically reduced. This kind of a person
is likely to have a fairly rough time on crossing over because
a person with low vibrations is automatically pulled down
to the realm of the same low vibrations to accommodate the
same vibrations. There is no St Peter, no Pearly Gates,
no one there to judge you. You judge yourself by the level
of accumulated vibrations you gained throughout your life
on physical earth.
Q33. But are not there psychics who do not agree
V. Again, not all psychics are spiritually advanced. Besides,
there is a most important difference between someone who
is psychic and someone who is spiritually advanced. Psychics
may demonstrate their psychic skills but that does not mean
they are in fact spiritual. Those psychics who are not spiritually
advanced could be dangerous. But someone who is psychic
and also highly spiritual, then you have pure gold. So that
the qualitative, spiritually advanced psychics usually agree
with what is afterlife valid knowledge.
Q34. But aren’t there many so called psychics
who deceive the public?
V. Frauds you get everywhere because of the human condition.
But let me qualify that: there are people who are not psychic
and are not who they claim they are - and try to fleece
the public of their hard earned income. That is unfair.
That is unjust. That is criminal. Then you get the second
class of people who are a little bit psychically gifted.
But unless they are accurate they should not take any money
from the public. The pure gold, as I mentioned earlier,
is where you have spiritually advanced and psychically gifted
mediums – they are not easy to access, sometimes impossible
Q. 35. Do you yourself have any psychic insights
when talking to people?
V. Interesting you should ask that because sometimes I
get psychic insights – and sometimes not.
Q. 36. What about those big time scientists who
specifically wrote against the paranormal and the afterlife?
V. The ones I came across over the years - Professor Richard
Dawkins, Professor Carl Sagan and those other negative psychologists
I have on my net I rebutted – those giants of science
thinking because they are scientists they have ‘authority’
about anything on earth. They may be good materialist scientists
but NOT ONE OF THEM ever rebutted the objective evidence
for the afterlife – not one! They have NO OBJECTIVE
AUTHORITY at all when they deal with psi. The rule is that
they can’t have a valid argument without objective
authority. I have my rebuttals on these scientists who have
shown they are really ignorant about anything paranormal
– go to my homepage www.victorzammit.com . I was so
amazed reading Prof Carl Sagan’s attacks on the paranormal
where he confused everyone about mediumship: he confused
trance-mediumship with mental mediumship and direct-voice
mediumship. I reiterate: these materialist scientists, and
negative psychologists have not done their homework, do
not understand what is the real paranormal, do not discriminate
between the quacks and the psi geniuses, did not rebut the
existing objective evidence for the afterlife – they
just regurgitate their own pre-conceived negatively entrenched
bias. They have no authority at all. You can access my full
rebuttals of these giants of science on my website.
37. What’s your final message?
I put it very simply: in the overall scheme of things time
on earth is very short. Inevitably we – rich or poor,
black and white - all have to cross over. Understand what
you must do to obtain higher vibrations – higher spirituality.
The more you get to know about the afterlife the easier
the transition will be from physical planet earth to the
afterlife dimension: that’s guaranteed!
38. My mother passed on a recently. Does
the spirit of a person hang around their family for awhile?
We loved her very much and miss her. Do we need to let her
go and get on with her new life?
First of all you must understand that when she passed on
she would have been met by her own loved ones who had passed
on before her. This is to assist her in the transition to
the afterlife. If she were unconscious for a long time,
she still would have been met but then she would be taken
to a very special place where she would be taken care of
and that she would get a ‘rest period’ to detach
herself from the illness she had on earth to adjust to the
new wonderful environment. If she had the afterlife information,
she could have had a ‘conscious transition’
which meant she would have seen all those who were around
her when she died. If there were ‘heart to heart’
connection – as you indicated there was, then when
her mental faculties are back to normal, yes, with absolute
certainty she would be back to visit her loved ones on earth
– that is the law: physical death does NOT sever the
love connection. She will have her own life – but
where there is a strong positive connection, she will be
back frequently to visit her loved ones on earth. Love is
the most powerful force in the universe. Life is but for
a just short time, but love is forever!
Do NOT grieve – that would make it very hard on her
in the spirit world. Grief is not positive energy –
yes do let her go BUT continue to express your love for
her – she will receive the love because she is still
alive and because our minds are just like live radio stations
– we’re sending vibrations everytime we concentrate
on our loved ones and when we send them our love. We feel
the love from our loved ones when they send their love to
us. Without exception, all humans will make the transition
to the spirit world and without exception physical death
cannot sever the heart to heart love link. That is guaranteed!