"SCIENCE" v SKEPTICAL LABORATORY SCIENTISTS
Most people are aware of the value of scientific
method in conducting rigorously controlled experiments in
relation to the paranormal. The work of the great pioneers
of Afterlife Science like Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver
Lodge working with physical and trance mediums established
the genuineness of physical mediumship. The Rhine Research
Institute gave hard experimental evidence for psychic phenomena
and the Windbridge Institute for mental mediumship.
But many mainstream, reductionist closed-minded scientists
take a very unscientific stand on the afterlife by refusing
to be cross-examined on their claims that there is no evidence
for the afterlife. They have not done any direct experiments
in the area and make outrageous statements based purely
on their own untested negative prejudices.
legal process demands an examination of the character and
motives of a witness. It allows for cross examination to
test the extent of knowledge and credibility of the witness.
It rigorously pursues the skeptical scientist to show specifically
where, when, how and why the evidence for the afterlife
cannot be accepted.
a witness (eg, a closed minded scientist) is sworn to tell
the truth in a courtroom situation, but does not tell the
truth, the witness could go to prison for years for ‘perjury’
– lying while under oath. Not only that, when asked
a question, the witness MUST answer the question –
otherwise the witness will be in contempt of court and could
end up in prison. As I stated in my cross-examinations of
those couple of closed minded skeptics – see cross-examinations
– you will see that the witness MUST answer the question
put to him.
For example if a closed minded skeptic is asked, “Why
is it that some of the most intelligent scientists (naming
a few of those scientists) who scientifically investigated
the afterlife – accepted the afterlife?” The
witness MUST answer that.
Also, the closed minded witnesses MUST also answer all questions
to do with the scientific evidence for the afterlife –
that which is objective and repeatable. At the moment these
skeptical scientists can unilaterally make ridiculous claims
against paranormal science – knowing they do not have
to answer a question and if they do, they know they do not
have to answer honestly.
No genius skeptical scientist, no flamboyant closed
minded skeptic, no anti-afterlife academic materialist has
ever agreed to be cross-examined on their knowledge of the
scientific investigation of the afterlife in public. This
is because they know they will be publicly and internationally
the courtroom skeptics avoid dealing with the scientific
substance of the paranormal and the afterlife evidence –
they don’t have to answer these critical questions.
They’ve been doing this for the last 150 years. But
NOT if they are pinned down in a witness box where they
MUST answer all questions, where truth inevitably will out.
Return to Index