PROFESSOR STEPHEN HAWKING TRIES TO MISLEAD
US ABOUT THE WORKING OF THE UNIVERSE I was
watching a documentary this week on cable television showing
anti-afterlife atheist Prof Stephen Hawking making a claim
that he has a 'theory of everything'. He starts off the
program by saying he can explain everything that happens
in the universe. WRONG! He may fool those
who want to be fooled but not others. Why not? Because for
an hour all he did was to identify and describe
the different energies and non-energies in the universe
- gravity, electromagnetic forces, light, space, speed,
time. But NOT ONCE did he give us any indication HOW these
forces e.g. gravity came about and what maintains their
particular quality. He used the 'smorgasbord argument' -
choosing only that information which supports his deeply
negative unsubstantiated prejudices- and ignoring anything
that contradicts or invalidates his argument.-
Nor did he explain WHY the speed of light
is what it is. Or why constellations contintue to exist.
Or why there are different levels of vibrations in the universe.
Or why 'positive' energies have to balance the
'dark energies'. Or why on planet earth 'growth' takes place
or why evolution exists. Or what or who organized the laws
of the universe and where the 'order' in the universe comes
from. Scientists can only identify universal phenomena,
they can only speculate, but they CANNOT tell us how the
phenomena came about. Unless of course, this atheistic scientist
blames it all on 'everything came by chance' -
something the non-aligned scientists do not accept anymore.
Space, time and energy he said did not exist before the
big bang (***there are other scientists who do not agree
there was a big bang). But because he deliberately restricted
his sources of information he negligently omits to mention
that: empirically elicited information tells us that there
is NO TIME in the afterlife dimension - but there is 'energy'
vibrating at a higher level. So it is possible to have a
dimension before the big bang where there is NO TIME but
there is energy - since energy cannot be created or destroyed.
This atheist is wrong claiming - without evidence and though
sheer speculation - that "there was nothing" before
the Big Bang. Accordingly, he is wrong when he said "there
cannot be a first cause becuase nothing existed before the
No atheistic scientist has ever properly explained the intelligent
first cause: that there was a first 'intelligent cause'
which brought about the intelligent effects all obeying
the universal laws - everything we observe in the universe.
Return to Index