James Randi Attacks Lawyer Victor Zammit - Victor's
Rebuttal
Someone sent me email that James Zwinge Randi,
(hereinafter JZR) had some fifteen articles attacking me.
Why is JZR wrong and most unfair and unjust in his attempt
to maliciously attack me? Why is he so hugely frustrated?
Why is he fuming with anger? Why is he so venomously aggressive
against me and psi experts and gifted mediums?
1. Failure to beat my challenge. More
than seven years ago JZR implied he was going to take me
on regarding the ONE MILLION DOLLARS for anyone to show
that my objective empirical evidence has no validity. That
was over seven years ago, I AM STILL WAITING!! And anything
which has not been rebutted will stay valid until it is
rebutted. If empirical afterlife evidence cannot be rebutted
it will stay valid – permanently. His refusal to even
try on his claimed basis that, “You can’t
prove the negative” is invalid, illegitimate,
unacceptable and worthless – not consistent with the
professional rules of debate - see below.
2. JZR is allegedly a stage magician
– JZR is NOT a scientist, he is not an empiricist,
he is not a scholar or an intellectual or a researcher.
He has NO formalized learning regarding experimentation.
He never had any of his writings referred to by academic
scientists or scholars. In fact his conduct shows him to
be a conman, a mind-manipulator and someone who himself
admits - and this is a matter of public record - to
being highly skilled in deception, trickery and conning.
3. Critical thinking? I nearly fell off
my chair laughing when he states that he is into 'critical
thinking' – and his foundation is based on critical
thinking! How can anyone be a critical thinker when he already
has made up his mind that the paranormal does not exist,
the afterlife does not exist, afterlife physics does not
exist, non-physical energy does not exist – even though
there is a great deal of irrefutable empirical evidence
to the contrary? True critical thinking requires the strictest
objectivity. There cannot be genuine critical thinking when
someone is deeply negatively entrenched in crusading against
the afterlife, against the paranormal with an apriori
negative conclusions deeply entrencehd!
4. Silly propaganda: JZR plays dirty to
willfuly deceive the public when he repeatedly comes up
with the usual rubbish that he can’t refute my objective
empirical evidence because you, “cannot prove
the negative.” Why is JZR absolutely wrong and
is misleading the gullible? See 6) below.
5. “Zammit has been *ridiculed for the
very fact that he offers zero proof of what he preaches,
but only scolds us for not proving him wrong
— when he offers no evidence!”
Ridiculed by whom? NO scientist ever rebutted my objective
twenty two areas of afterlife evidence or made denigrating
comments about my afterlife research. No professional empiricist,
no professional of any sort has ever shown why my evidence
is not valid or expressed anything negatively about my afterlife
research. As a matter of fact, NOT one person on earth has
ever rebutted the admissibility of my objective afterlife
evidence in the seven years that I had the evidence on my
website. Not one professional litigation lawyer ever showed
that why my evidence cannot be admitted as empirical evidence.
This is when level headed people start to ask whether JZR
is fully with us on this planet earth. Some non-entity,
a nobody, an insignificant, uninformed skeptic, a loser
and a defeatist and a personal friend of JZR - A.S. This
nobody A.S. tried to 'mock' my evidence and my website,
tried to be cynical and sarcastic AND by using my name
- to illegitimately get hits on the Net because he's a nobody
- he's just a cheat scurrilously stealing the name of those
who have a good name. He's as popular as a worm in a bird's
nest. Notice very carefully, his mentor JZR gave up trying
to to take me on, trying to brief informed empiricists
to deal with my irrefutable and substantive evidence. What
a bunch of no hopers!
For the record, no one has been able to rebut my afterlife
evidence. Period!
6. ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE: JZR, “You
can't prove the negative ... I have never claimed that I
could prove there isn’t an afterlife. That’s
like trying to prove that there isn’t a Barbie doll
on the moon” (Sic). This is JZR's big
gun against me - mistakenly stating, "You can't
prove the negative."
JZR here shows he has more enthusiasm to be cynical,
sarcastic and denigrating than being knowledgeable about
admissibility of evidence. His statement also reveals how
embarrassingly wrong he is, how ignorant he is of the rules
of professional debate and how invalid his analogy is. Not
any of the negatively entrenched empiricists has ever support
him on this one.
Read this very carefully. In professional debate, the
asserter has to positively expressly state his evidence,
as I have done with my 22 different areas of evidence www.victorzammit.com
. Here I just identify a few if these areas: EVP, ITC, MEDIUMSHIP
of all kinds, XENOGLOSSY, PSYCHIC LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS,
POLTERGEISTS - (in all some twenty two different areas of
afterlife evidence). The opposition then has to rebut the
evidence in each area - has to show that what has been expressly
stated cannot be valid – giving technically admissible
reasons – where, when, why and how the evidence cannot
be admitted or to completely discredit the objective evidence.
JZR failed to do that. I strongly advise JZR to go to an
experienced professional litigation lawyer to take over
the debate with me because only a litigation lawyer would
know the procedure on how to properly rebut expressly stated
admissible evidence.
Also JZR appears to have the cunning but
not the intelligence or the empirical skills or the expertise
or the essential knowledge of scientific method to negate
the expressly stated evidence. Even expert negative empiricists,
senior litigation lawyers, District and Supreme Court judges
and senior scientists failed to rebut my strong afterlife
evidence. As well, debunkers of all kinds failed to do that
too. The evidence accordingly remains valid and
will continue to be valid. Why? Because the evidence is
empirical evidence which means it can NEVER be refuted or
rebutted or be invalidated in any way. Senior lawyers and
scientists know that very well, otherwise they would have
taken me on years ago.
7. Failure to duplicate psychic phenomena:
JZR had stated words to the effect that he can duplicate
anything psychics can produce – but in practice he
has shown he can’t.
In The Fulcrum television show in 2003 in England JZR tried
to show that ‘cold reading’ accounts
for mental mediumship of psychics such as John Edward, James
Van Praagh, Sylvia Browne and others. The producers of this
television show were fooled, misled and misinformed by JZR
into thinking that what mediums do is all ‘cold
reading’ and invited him onto the TV show. With
cameras on, JZR came out in front of the studio audience
trying to do a John Edward psychic performance. He was so
bad - so embarrassingly bad, so incompetent, so hugely ridiculous
when he tried to emulate gifted mental medium John Edeard,
that most of the audience booed him and told him to get
out of the studio. The highly embarrassed producers had
no alternative but to stop the cameras. This item was unfortunately
edited out of the show – an item which is pure gold
showing one of the greatest frauds in history on screen
trying to commit fraud. See http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/articles/keen/randi.htm
I have challenged debunkers (including JZR) – and
others from around the world to duplicate the results David
Thompson is getting in his materialization experiments where
spirit people fully materialize, have conversations with
us and answer questions intelligently. For HALF A MILLION
dollars to put up or shut up! But if and when
they fail, JZR has to hand over our medium the said sum
of half a million dollars. The debunkers, including JZR
very wisely chose to stay as quiet as a mouse- because JZR
CANNOT duplicate our sensational psychic results. Is JZR
too cowardly to take us on?!”
8. My published research: JZR stated when
he was attacking gifted medium Allison Dubois, “Oh
yes, he's a published author" — self-published.
He paid for the printing of his ONE book, himself, and he's
the only one who sells copies, right out of his home! (Actually
I wrote more than three books) The fact is that my afterlife
256 page book goes to more than 100 countries every day
of the week. I allow it to be downloaded for free because
of feedback that the information is so urgent and important
to so many people. In many countries where the book is being
read people are not able to drop into their local bookshop
or buy on the internet with a credit card. It has been translated
into a number of languages, included Spanish, Italian, Russian,
Portuguese, Dutch (p.c.), French (p.c.) and later on it
is going to be translated into Chinese and German. Up until
now I have resisted numerous offers to publish the book
mainstream because in doing so I would have to cease making
it available for free download. However the book has already
been published in Russia and is now in bookshops all over
Russia and soon it will be published mainstream throughout
the rest of the world. I gave myself a number of years to
continue to refine my presentation and sent my afterlife
research to hard core skeptical debunkers to rebut –
including JZR. After waiting for a number of years, no one
has been able to rebut the evidence, no one has been able
to show that my evidence is not valid or that it is inadmissible.
So my next stage for the book is to go mainstream knowing
that no scientist, no debunker, no skeptic, no stage entertainer
had the skills, the ability, the knowledge and the substance
to rebut the afterlife evidence.
9. Further, why has this JZR not rebutted a mainstream
highly academic book IS THERE AN AFTERLIFE, modelled on
my book by Prof David Fontana? Or why has not this
sarcastic attacker JZR rebutted that brilliant book on the
paranormal by Dr Dean Radin, THE CONSCIOUS UNIVERSE (translated
into fourteen languages)? The answer is obvious: this JZR
lacks the information, lacks the depth, lacks the skills,
lacks the knowledge - he is ignorant of the technicalities
of scientific method. For heaven’s sake, what do you
expect from an alleged kids’ stage entertainer who
trained in ‘verbal sleight of hand’
to try to fool the public?
10. BY WHAT AUTHORITY? JZR implies that
I do not have authority to write about the afterlife. My
academic qualifications are in Ancient and Modern History,
Major in Psychology, Major in Scientific Method as an adjunct
to Psychology, Law with particular expertise in the admissibility
of evidence. Further, my intensive research led me to communicate
with intelligences from the afterlife in the same way as
did some of our greatest scientists who walked this planet
earth including Sir William Crookes – the greatest
scientist of his time, Sir Oliver Lodge – the greatest
physicist of his time, Sir William Barrett – a leading
Professor of Physics in his time, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
brilliant writer - and many others. I am personally involved
in the David Thompson materializations experiments –
where I regularly have conversations with afterlife intelligences
– people who lived on this planet earth and now walk
and talk with us and answer intelligent questions. We are
doing voice correlations and the results so far are just
stunningly impressive.
11. JZR’s racism – his racial
hatred for American Indian comes about when he tries by
imputation to attack the spirituality of Silver Birch and
White Eagle. Any intelligent, non-aligned person will see
that these said personalities made a huge contribution towards
understanding the purpose of life on our planet earth. No
one on earth in fifty years has ever shown that what these
two afterlife intelligences stated was wrong, invalid, irrelevant
or unnecessary. The contrary is that we see a great deal
of supreme spiritual inspirational eloquence unmatched by
any other spiritual literature we have on earth. But note
very interestingly, this racist JZR does not identify any
wrongful or irrational or illogical aspect of these two
spirit entities from some twenty books of information which
were transmitted from them. Why not? The level headed reasonable
person does not care what race high spirituality comes from.
Absolutely, this JZR will one day, guaranteed, swallow his
own racial venom.
12. JZR’s attempt to attack Victor’s
credibility: “Victor said that their "…
energy is rotating much faster than the atoms on earth"?
Folks, this is a lawyer registered to practice at the bar
in Australia. Professionally, he gives advice to clients.
The mind boggles."
Victor: Here JZR shows classic Neurolinguistic
Programming (NLP) in action regarding ‘deletions’
when JZR receives information fundamentally inconsistent
with his own cherished materialist beliefs which gives him
a lot of anxiety. This materialist JZR’s own belief
is that there is no afterlife; there is no paranormal. Modern
physicists are stating, that the paranormal can be explained
by the afterlife energy swirling faster that the physical
energy. I was referring to Chapter 9 of my book about the
atomic vortices swirling faster than physical atoms - see
Einstein’s E=mc2 (squared) and to my chapter on QUANTUM
PHYSICS AND THE AFTERLIFE see chapter 25. But of course,
JZR being an alleged kids’ magician, one can understand
his colossal cynicism and ignorance about these highly advanced
scientific conceptualizations. I do strongly suggest the
reader to read these two critical chapters. And when you
do, you will understand how ridiculous, how uninformed and
preposterous JZR’s comments are.
13. JZR implies Zammit is a ‘believer’.
What absolute nonsense! I am a lawyer empiricist
and do not have the luxury of beliefs. I study cause-effect
relationship. But JZR is himself a believer in
materialism–a BELIEF that nothing exists outside the
five senses. And ANY personal belief – as JZR has,
is itself subject to complete invalidation. So, JZR is launching
his venom from a position of extreme weakness – subjective
beliefs not supported by empiricism or science or objectivity.
14. JZR states: “Strange Mr. Zammit,
mentioned last week, complained for years that no one —
particularly I — would test "psychic" Chris
Robinson of the UK. "Well,
Susan Blackmore tested him, and he failed, but Zammit carried
on bitching…” The fact is that
according to Chris Robinson, Susan Blackmore NEVER really
tested him. This JZR got his marbles all mixed up - as usual.
Richard Wiseman “tested” Chris. But the problem
is that Wiseman is deeply entrenched as an anti-psychic
debunker. He is on record for unilaterally changing the
agreed protocol with Chris without notice to willfully fundamentally
try to bring about negative results. This was done because
it was obvious Chris Robinson was a gifted pre-cognitive
and he was obtaining positive results. This gave Wiseman
a great deal of anxiety, stress and he went into a panic
– so he cheated and started testing him on psychometry
and then cheated to produce a negative result! And this
Wiseman, a member of the most notorious anti-paranormal
group in the United States, had the audacity to say he had
tested a gifted psychic? How silly! How ridiculous! What
a waste of time and money! It’s like going to the
Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan asking him if some African American
is as intelligent as a white boy. Any dumb dumb, as with
this Richard Wiseman/Chris Robinson case, would know the
answer before the experiment takes place!
15. “Why don’t you take up JZR’s
one million dollars challenge Victor?” an
emailer asked me. My standard answer is that JZR does NOT
have a genuine offer. He is on record for telling Prof Dennis
Rawlings regarding the alleged million dollars offer, “I
will always have a way out (of paying …)” Need
we say more? JZR’s offer is the biggest hoax in paranormal
history. Why has no applicant EVER reached the second stage
of his challenge? Because he fails them ALL in his own subjective
first test of his challenge! He is a judge in his own
cause because he is the sole arbiter as to what technically
constitutes psychic phenomena. No amount of legitimate,
genuine and valid paranormal objective evidence will be
sufficient to a closed minded skeptic if he does not want
to accept it. His million dollar challenge is a farce -
and JZR knows that! The psychics and mediums know that.
The psi empiricists know that. I know that. And too many
people know that too! I have been advising gifted psychics
and other potential applicants KEEP AWAY FROM THIS HOAXER,
from this CHARLATAN– he’s wasting your precious
time and money. GET IT?
16. From an emailer: why do you think JZR attacked
you when you say you did not attack him first? That’s
an easy one to answer. The substantive objective evidence
for the paranormal and the afterlife give JZR huge anxiety,
stress and nervous tension. Why? Because the evidence shows
that he’s wasted his lifetime being a debunker, a
believer in nothing. He’s got no evidence, no substance,
no empiricism at all that he is right, that his skeptical
beliefs are correct. We both CANNOT be right. One of us
is wrong. As I have shown, I have science and empiricism
on my side and in any inconsistency with skeptical beliefs
empiricism prevails over skeptical beliefs. Without his
debunking, JZR will be a non-entity, a nothing, a nobody,
he’s no longer a celebrity. All the skeptical work
he did in his life, all his skeptical debunking, all his
tricks, all his anti-paranormal, anti-afterlife propaganda
will become absolutely and totally irrelevant. All will
ignore him. To offset this anxiety, he’s caught in
a trap of being negatively motivated into keeping on being
an extremely skeptical, anti-paranormal, anti-afterlife
crusader.
17. JZR gives the impression he is 'harmless'
in his denigrating the afterlife and the paranormal evidence.
Harmless? Anyone
who is willfully disseminating darkness - telling people
directly or indirectly not investigate the afterlife,
that there is no afterlife, that there are
no consequences to one's conduct one earth, that
the Law of Cause and Effect does not exist - and implies
that people can cheat, lie, negatively manipulate, be most
vindictive, push cruelty to its extreme to get their way
- this kind of 'darkness' will inexorably elicit huge negative
effects. Further, the record shows for decades he has vindictively
and unconscionably attacked many decent gifted mediums,
scientists, empiricists and others who stated that the afterlife
exists and has huge consequences. You call that harmless?
People regularly ask me, “What is likely
to happen to this JZR on crossing over?” Well,
that is an easy one to answer. He is on record for:
• consistently disseminating darkness on a global
level,
• consistently being aggressively dirty with people
who do not have the same beliefs he has,
• negative manipulation to hurt, harm and injure people,
• instigating psychological violence against pro-psi
professors of whose success he is very much jealous,
• consistent cheating, lying and misinforming people
about the afterlife,
• refusing to examine the hard core empirical evidence
for the afterlife,
• consistently being cruel and selfish,
• misleading a great number of people about the validity
of communicating with the afterlife.
We are credibly informed, by empirically elicited information,
that for every effect there is a cause and for every negative
action there is a negative reaction. We are also informed
that we have a duplicate etheric body of our physical body.
Even the Russians accept that and call it the bioplasmic
body.
We accordingly directly affect the level of vibration of
that etheric body by the deeds and omissions in our lifetime.
‘Bad’ deeds (e.g. cruelty, selfishness) lower
the vibrational energy of the etheric body and ‘good’
deeds increase the vibrations of the etheric body –
that is classic afterlife physics.
On crossing over, we take with us the accumulated vibrations
we gain or lose throughout our lifetime. Now it would appear
in context of his conduct, and his refusal to accept there
is an afterlife, someone like JZR is likely to cross over
with low vibrations. This means, given the highly credible
afterlife information, he will automatically be pulled down
to an afterlife low vibrating dark realm to accommodate
his level of vibrations.
The afterlife physics is that no low vibrating entity can
ever go to a realm which is vibrating at a higher level
than the entity’s vibrations – the law is ‘like
inexorably attracts like’.
Further, since JZR does not accept that there is an afterlife,
on crossing over he may continue to think he is still alive
on earth. He will know that something is different, like
people NOT answering him when he tries to talk to them.
But if he refuses to admit he’s dead, mental confusion
could set in – in his realm of darkness.
We are informed from highly credible sources that this
terrible mental confusion could last for “thousands
of years”. But this is not the worst case scenario.
If his vibrations are very low, he would automatically
be pulled down to the lowest, darkest realm where he would
find himself in the company of some of the worst human beings
this world has ever seen – where there will be violence,
despair and terror– and that could last for thousands
of years. Ughh!!!
A universal law is that for every effect there’s
a cause - for every action there’s a reaction –
which means nobody gets away with negative karmic conditions
– nobody!
Victor Zammit, January 2007
<<
Return to Articles |