Speakers' Corner - Victor Zammit, orator:
See also 32 historical pictures
of Speakers' Corner - London and Sydney ...
see more ...
For those around the world who never attended Speakers'
Corner at London's Hyde Park in London or at the Speakers'
Corner at the Sydney Domain, a tremendous shock will be
experienced. Speakers' Corner is symbolic for the democratic
process: freedom of speech and assembly. But to many people
it is a place for entertainment. Those tourists who used
to visit Speakers' Corner were absolutely stunned at the
British tradition of freedom of speech.
Here below is more oratory from Victor, who had his own
style, his own way of enlightening his weekly big crowds.
Here we are again … a warm wonderful welcome to you
all … I see people coming from everywhere …
they see Victor here … now …and yes, we are
going to have another big crowd to-day.
welcome everyone … welcome those who live here, welcome
those who come from overseas … and welcome all Christians,
Followers of Krishna, Hindus, Moslems, Jews, atheists …
agnostics … and others.
is the place. Now is the time. We have lovely blue skies,
warm sunshine here all around huge beautiful trees …
so relax with Victor … this lovely afternoon …
now we do have a good crowd … so soon! … Questions
… any questions …don’t be shy. Victor
will answer all questions about life, liberty and the pursuit
of happiness …
Here Victor this guy wearing a dog-collar … a Catholic
priest … his name is Peter …
(to the priest): could you wait until I take this question
first … YES YOU!!!
I have a question for you …
What’s your name?
My name is Charlie …
Aren’t you one of those atheist speakers we see around
Yes, yes I am … I have a question. You said last week
that there is an afterlife … I don’t agree with
that … nobody has ever returned to tell us there’s
an afterlife …
Obviously you have not done any research about the afterlife.
You are articulating your negative, anti-afterlife prejudices.
But let me tell you something that will shock you and will
shock the whole world …SCIENCE now has irreversibly
established that those who crossed over have in fact communicated
and are communicating with those who are still on this physical
planet earth …
What science are you talking about?
I have studied the afterlife from an empirical… that
is from an objective, scientific perspective …
HOLD ON BEFORE YOU SAY ANYTHING … what qualifications
have you to say that you are an empiricist? … That’s
something I ask every speaker …
Fair enough question! I have four university degrees –
three degrees from highly accredited universities –
the University of New South Wales in Sydney Australia. I
have higher degree from an American university which is
unconventional but with extremely high standards where I
had to debate a State Attorney General on the constitutional
law of the Bill of Rights as part of my higher degree …
see my website ABOUT VICTOR www.victorzammit.com –
it’s all there …
also have a University Diploma in Education – from
another accredited university – the University of
Technology, in Sydney.
I have an Arts degree with a major in Psychology where I
had also had to do three years full time at professional
level Scientific Method adjunct to the subject of Psychology
… That gave me three years of doing experiments empirically
… understanding what is objective, subjective and
anecdotal evidence in science.
gave me training in what variables to control in experiments
– extraneous, dependent and independent variables.
One of the greatest lessons I learnt from my professor was:
"tell me what extraneous variables you controlled and
I will tell you how good your experiment is".
also have a Diploma in Hypnotism from the accredited New
South Wales School of Hypnotic Sciences - as an adjunct
to my University degree in Psychology degree.
I do have AUTHORITY to tell you with absolute certainty
that the evidence for the afterlife is objective, is empirical,
is repeatable, is scientific.
what qualifications do YOU have?
Charlie: I reached third level in high shool .... so, let
me deal with this guy Charlie ...
Why do you call it scientific …?
Where you have a formula repeated over time and space, keeping
variables constant, and you get the same results, then you
have science – because you can predict with accuracy.
And when you can predict with accuracy, you are testing
the validity of a phenomenon you are measuring – and
inevitably that is science …
Which scientists are claiming there is an afterlife …
Correction – you should be asking which scientists
USED THEIR PROFESSIONALISM AND EXPERITISE IN SCIENCE and
have come to the irrevocable conclusion that there is an
Yes, yes, yes … we want to know how science was used
to show there is an afterlife …
OK … we’re getting somewhere now. Let’s
approach this systematically … here let me get my
book out … there is Sir William Crookes, perhaps the
greatest scientist in his time. He was a skeptic. But he
investigated and the evidence was overwhelming … and
he accepted the existence of the afterlife.
is Sir Oliver Lodge, one of the world’s greatest scientists
– he too investigated and he too accepted the afterlife
is Sir William Barrett … and other great world personalities
Arthur Conan Doyle, one of the greatest British authors
– he investigated and he accepted the afterlife …
Emmanuel Swedenborg – the greatest European scientist
of his time – earlier than Sir William Crookes …
that famous American Professor Hyslop who was a skeptic
but on investigating the afterlife, like other scientists
he accepted the afterlife …
that unorthodox American investigator George Meek …
of the pioneers of television John Logie Baird accepted
the afterlife through his investigations … From Canada
there’s that brilliant medical scientist Dr Glen Hamilton
… and recently we get those professors who talk about
quantum physics and the afterlife …
England - not far from here in Bath on the West coast …
someone I correspond with Ron Pearson – see his brilliant
afterlife physics …
Archie Roy- another brilliant Professor from Scotland who
used his expertise in science and came to his irretrievable
conclusion that yes, he said, there is an afterlife …
of course …
Then there are the Quantum Physics scientists who investigated
and accepted the paranormal ...
must not forget that brilliant physicist who won a Nobel
Prize for his physics who confirms – using strictly
scientific method - that the paranormal is real –
Professor Brian Josephson.
Professor Fred Alan Wolf … and from Germany there’s
Professor Ernst Senkowski … and back to the United
States we get those other giants of the empirical paranormal
Professor Harold Puthoff, Professor Russell Targ, Professor
Amit Goswami …
that Dr Dean Radin whose book on the paranormal was translated
into fourteen languages … there are so many more …
go to my book on the internet and you can access all these
names and my scientific evidence for the afterlife completely
free of charge…
Jesus!!!! That’s impressive … I’ve never
come across these names before!
NO NO NO … my name is not Jesus … it’s
Victor! (crowd response)
haven't heard about it about it because you have NOT researched
the afterlife systematically …
me tell you something else … I KNOW that my evidence
for the afterlife is ABSOLUTELY substantive, irrefutable
and irrebuttable. Why? Because the evidence I presented
has objectivity and repeatability.
means, as every scientist knows - no one on earth would
be able to rebut objectivity and repeatability. The afterlife
evidence is with us to stay whether we like it or not!
I don’t agree with that Victor … for every argument
you put across there will always be someone with an opposite
NOT THIS TIME Charlie … there will always be arguments
and counter-arguments where the evidence is subjective,
where there are beliefs and blind faith.
when the evidence is absolutely empirical, objective and
repeatable, there can never be counter arguments. Let me
explain more on this one …
I challenged skeptics – and this is something you
can see for yourself on my website – remember it is
www.victorzammit.com that if they could show that my evidence
for the afterlife cannot be valid, I will hand over ONE
MILLION DOLLARS cash!
Are you REAL about that? You mean nobody has beaten that
I went public on this one some years ago … NO genius
scientist, NO genius physicist, NO biologist, NO psychologist
… and NO genius skeptical debunker has been able to
beat my challenge … NO ONE has been able to show that
my objective, repeatable objective evidence for the afterlife
is not valid!
in professional debate any submitted evidence which has
not been rebutted will remain valid – translated this
means THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE and no skeptic, no anti-afterlife
atheist, no secular scientist and no gross materialist can
do anything about this: THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE!
Charlie … you’re as quiet as a mouse …
YOU would like to take me on … what’re your
qualifications this Charlie asked me … wake up you
anti-afterlife prophets of doom … you are living in
the past … you have not done your homework.
Are you crusading Victor?
ABSOLUTELY NOT! …I do not crusade, I do not evangelize,
I do not preach religion … but I do have a mission
to educate uninformed people like you who are atheistically
anti-afterlife who have not investigated.
up and understand that no skeptical debunker, no scientist,
no philosopher no existentialist writer has ever explained
anywhere, anytime that there is no afterlife or that there
could be no afterlife ….
the priest: But there Victor, I must say, no one can prove
the negative …
I have expressly stated some twenty two areas of objective
afterlife evidence. In professional debate if the evidence
is not rebutted, the evidence will remain valid. But as
I said before, if the evidence is repeatable and objective,
it can NEVER be rebutted. And the evidence will remain VALID!
you come to Victor you'd better have done your homework
… many others have tried and many others have miserably
tell you … I tell this crowd here and now …
the afterlife has HUGE consequences and we here in the West
are discouraged to talk about it …
Why’s that Victor?
Why is that? Simply because materialism has become so voracious.
Materialism will not allow people to become spiritual. When
you become spiritual you will be LESS of a consumer because
you will be careful what to buy, what to eat, where to go.
is about spending big and spending now. And if you don’t
have the money, the materialists say GO BORROW THE MONEY!
But keep on spending, spending … as much as you can
… get a bigger house, get a bigger car, get a bigger
swimming pool …
And what’s wrong with that?
That’s short term thinking and short term planning.
You’re on this planet earth for a relatively short
time – just a few decades … then you will die
… you will cross over to an afterlife where time is
by earth’s standard too long … hundreds, thousands,
millions and much, much more
But what’s wrong with having the best things in life
Absolutely nothing wrong if you can afford it … but
I am referring to those who go on borrowing to try to impress
… get what you want but you must NEVER forget you
are only here for a short time and what you DO – not
what you believe in – will be critical as to what
will happen to you when you die …
(assertively): PUT YOUR HANDS UP ALL THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE
IN THE AFTERLIFE …
of a crowd of a couple of thousand (laughter) … only
FIVE don’t believe in the afterlife …
No Victor … only five have the courage to put their
hands up …
I want you to tell me what are your objections to the existence
of the afterlife
Religion has been telling us about the afterlife for thousands
of years … no one really takes them seriously ..
First, I AM NOT speaking on behalf of ANY the Churches …
make the difference between science and theology.
HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THEOLOGY!
am into science because science and empiricism are OBJECTIVE
– and religious beliefs and theology are SUBJECTIVE!
you don’t have to be a graduate to understand this
use EMPIRICISM because it is OBJECTIVE and all universities
from around the world accept that whenever there is an inconsistency
between OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE evidence, OBJECTIVE evidence
will prevail and will ALWAYS prevail …
only that … subjectivity, that is all religious and
other BELIEFS because they are SUBJECTIVE are themselves
subject to complete INVALIDATION!
You have an example of this …
Alright … I tell you something that the whole world
now accepts to be true … remember Galileo? That was
a classic case where there was theology clashing with science.
Galileo told the Pope that the earth is NOT in the center
of the universe – as theologians interpreted the Bible.
Galileo invited the Pope and his theologians to have a look
through the telescope to prove to the Church what science
happened? The Pope refused to look through the telescope!
He said that was the work of the devil! It took the Church
over THREE HUNDRED years to accept that science negated
the subjectivity of theology.
the crowd: DID YOU ALL UNDERSTAND THE GALILEO EXAMPLE?
loudly: YES VICTOR! Yes …
Yes Victor that’s impressive … I still can’t
believe that no skeptical professor took you on …
Have a look at my website … it’s ALL THERE!
I show what technically constitute afterlife evidence …
I have been investigating the afterlife for some fifteen
years now … and I put the afterlife evidence on my
Which evidence is this?
Here it is in this book as well … I put this book
on the internet …at no cost to anyone to read the
afterlife evidence - see www.victorzammit.com … here
for example in Chapter one I explain about evidence.
Chapter two I have respected scientists who investigated.
In Chapter three, as you can see here … I have materialization
experiences … Chapter four Voices on Tape …
Chapter five instrumental trans-communication … chapter
six near death experiences … chapter seven out of
body experiences …and here it goes all the way down
to remote viewing, apparitions, deathbed visions, quantum
mechanics and the afterlife …and many other chapters
you can find on my website …
I have to admit Victor … I’ve never come across
this material before. I will be reading it and studying
it and I’ll email you with any queries …
Well done Charlie …at least you are prepared to investigate
something that you can never avoid … crossing over
to the otherside when you die is something very, very serious.
So many people ignore it. So many people do themelves a
great deal of injustice; in their last days so many people
would have given anything to have read a book on the afterlife
and what’s going to happen when you die …
there Charlie … where is he … there you are
… would you not agree that communicating with the
otherside is THE GREATEST DISCOVERY IN HUMAN HISTORY ….
Return to Index