A truncated Extract from:
BEHIND THE UNIVERSE (II)
by Ron Pearson (see: www.bigbreed.org)
Passey: mental medium
In May 2000 an unexpected telephone call came from Cheltenham.
A lady calling herself Christian Passey said she was a medium
who had been instructed by a famous scientist to call and
see me. She did not know who he was but she wanted to know
if it would be in order for her to come to Bath and give
me a reading. I was intrigued and of course was only too
willing to agree.
She arrived on 14th May and began on her mission. I will
copy out the transcript and then afterwards will deal with
the extraordinary way the predictions communicated unfolded
in the next few days. I will itemise her statements, numbering
them as she did. They appear in italics. My comments follow
in ordinary script.
1. She said: “You have a meeting coming up within
a few weeks when you will be giving a lecture. This will
be a bombshell to some people. You will be trying to change
their perception and so must not expect the lecture to be
a total success though it will not be a total failure. The
trouble is that some people will not be sufficiently far-sighted
as to be able to take it on board.”
I had a lecture planned scheduled to take place in two weeks.
This was a summary of my ECM theory covered in detail in
our companion volumes. This had provided the alternative
to relativity briefly mentioned in Chapter 3. This was to
be presented at the ‘Bath Royal Literary and Scientific
Institution’, the BRLSI for short.
“However, a man whose name begins with Y (she could
not grasp the whole name) will call you in about two days.
He will be trying to help and can probably help you.”
A man called Steve Yabsley rang from the BBC in Bristol
two days later saying he had been informed of my lecture
and invited me along to give a plug for it on the radio.
3. “A superior from a past work situation will
This prediction did not come to pass for several weeks.
Then Professor Wallace who had been head of the Department
of Mechanical Engineering, where I had been a lecturer,
rang inviting me to give a talk about my theory. (I cut
out irrelevant interruptions from relatives).
6. “You will get many more ideas whilst out walking
I get most of my ideas whilst walking the dog.
9. “You are a great seer. The book you are writing
will make money.”
I am afraid this was at least partly a misfire: I never
finished the book. However, the communicator was clearly
aware I was writing one and it was entitled, "Inventions
that Saved the World". The plot was set in the future
at the year 2100, the fictitious writer being a historian
describing the way various inventions developed that solved
the problems of energy supply and global warming. I had
worked out the details of the inventions in fine detail
but a friend who read the script told me my characters did
not live. So I decided that I was unable to write convincing
12. “Your ideas in physics will not be accepted
in your lifetime. However, they will take root after your
death. You will have the satisfaction of observing this
from the spirit world.”
It is certainly true that I have been unable so far to make
a dent on communicating the solutions to physicists or cosmologists.
So this looks a very probable outcome.
16. “There will be further connections with the
University of Bath that are likely to be of help.”
Some help has been given but not enough as yet.
(Again communications from relatives )
I wished these relatives would not keep butting in. But
now the scientist gets back in again.
19 “Your work is superb – wonderful 8 or
9 out of 10”
Very flattering: I liked that!
20. “Please make papers easier to read”.
21 “Also it is very important that you make much
revision of past work.”
I will take notice of both points and will try to improve.
22. “You need to make a leap of intuition and
will do so soon.”
Does this mean people living in a parallel universe put
every invention we make into our heads? And now for the
final shattering message:
23. “I was known as Isaac Newton during my time
on Earth – Well done my boy. But I used to keep very
careful notebooks and that is something you should also
That ended the communication. It is true
that I have not kept careful notebooks but I have a pile
of papers full of the maths of over twenty years of effort
made during my retirement. This reading gave me renewed
determination to proceed. I still do not keep notebooks
but instead I write this series that covers the entire study.
It is my hope that this will satisfy my taskmaster. I would
hate to transfer to his world only to experience the wrath
of our most famous scientist.
Next day I was taking our boxer dog Jason for his morning
walk. At that time we were doing two long walks a day: one
in the morning and the other in the afternoon. We went up
a narrow road called ‘Dover’s Lane’ in
our village that ended in a fence and style leading to a
farmer’s field adjacent to nearby woods. However,
on nearing the fence that Jason had to duck through, since
he was too big for the style, I had a surprise.
Chicken wire was blocking the entire fence so that Jason
would no longer have access. At least this was the view
from about five metres distance. At about two metres the
chicken wire vanished! So Jason had no problem after all.
Instead I had a problem: I thought I must be hallucinating
and this was very troubling. Next day Yabsley rang from
BBC Bristol and we fixed up for the broadcast I mentioned
Then the next day Jason and I travelled the Dover’s
Lane route again. And there it was again: the chicken wire
under the fence just as it had appeared two days previously!
That I could be really hallucinating was very troubling
indeed. However, on we went and then there was a second
surprise. This time the chicken wire failed to vanish: it
was real and solid. We had to turn back. It now dawned on
me that I had seen the wire before it existed.
Could my taskmaster have deliberately induced this hallucination?
Could this be telling me I really was a seer? I dismissed
the thought since I do not consider that I have this gift,
but it did seem connected with Christian’s reading.
Soon the date for my lecture arrived and all was ready with
overhead transparencies stacked for display. This you will
remember was a summary of the new Exact Classical Mechanics
that provided an alternative to Einstein’s theory
of General Relativity. It was very gratifying to find I
had a very large audience. All seats were taken and some
had to stand at the back. This must have been a result of
All seemed to be going well for the first 40 minutes and
I felt I was getting the message across. At least nobody
But as I had been warned during the reading, I was not pleasing
everybody. Suddenly without warning and without waiting
for discussion time, a leading member of the institution,
Victor Suchar, broke in and started with a prepared lecture
of his own. In this he was attempting to discredit everything
I had been saying.
This did not please my audience at all. People were hissing
and some shouted for him to, “Shut up we have not
come to listen to you”. One man got up and put on
his coat preparing to leave. The whole atmosphere had suddenly
become poisoned. But Suchar pressed on regardless completely
indifferent to the turmoil he had aroused. Also the chairman
did nothing to stop him. He went on for the whole of the
remaining twenty minutes so totally wrecking my presentation.
Yet his argument was totally invalid. He spent nearly the
whole time describing an experiment planned for Earth orbit
but not yet flown. He said this would invalidate my work
when it was flown by proving one of the predictions of Einstein’s
theory known as ‘frame dragging’.
This argument was flawed on two counts. Firstly the experiment
had not been tried and so this prediction had not yet been
verified. Secondly the ECM alternative can be shown to give
the same predictions as Einstein’s ‘curved space-time’
so a positive outcome would support ECM theory equally well.
However, Suchar succeeded in his aim since he had ruined
the lecture and prevented me completing what had been planned.
It was all very annoying but it did show that people in
the next world are able to see what is going on here with
much greater clarity than we can.
One member, Keith Hudson, was so incensed by the incident
that he wrote a letter of protest to the BRLSI.
This lecture was the only one that did not appear in the
annual records and I wonder if Suchar had anything to do
with its omission.
This communication highlights the problem of trying to rectify
wrong aspects that have become entrenched in Cosmology and
indeed the whole of physics.
Two things have gone badly wrong to throw the discipline
onto a hopelessly wrong track. One is the total refusal
to accept that any aspect of the so-called, ‘paranormal’
can have any validity: particularly the existence of any
Yet the crazy thing is that they claim the existence of
some four varieties of parallel universes all existing in
the same space interpenetrating all others. Each of these
contains an infinite number of universes but none can communicate
with any others. So they are beyond experimental discovery
and this puts them outside the realm of science by definition.
Yet they make every effort to discredit mediumship: the
only way the existence of any parallel universe could be
The other thing that has thrown them wrong is a lack of
adequate understanding of classical mechanics resulting
in dreadful logical errors that have thrown them hopelessly
off track. This of course is the major part of my own discipline.
If they would only listen to us instead of branding anyone
like me a maverick perhaps some real, progress might be