|
A CLOSED-MINDED SKEPTIC
WHO IS DELUDING HIMSELF
- AND OTHERS!
One of the most flamboyant but extremely negatively
prejudiced closed minded skeptic/materialist who lives in Miami is J
Randi. This man I call JR is either too ignorant to read plain English
to understand the $1m challenge or he is knowingly, willfully and maliciously
misleading the American and other people about my offer of the aforesaid
$1m. The only reason why he will be doing this is because this JR cannot
rebut the evidence for the afterlife! There is no other explanation.
In response to the evidence I have in my book
on the Net, this JR mistakenly stated publicly no one can ‘prove
the negative.’
To willfully mislead JR conveniently ignores
the expressly stated evidence I presented for the existence of the afterlife.
Now if you investigate my evidence for the existence
of the afterlife, you will see at least 23 different areas of what the
courts call expressly stated ‘objective evidence.’
You will come across the Electronic Voice Phenomena,
the Instrumental Transcommunication, the SCOLE Experiments, different
kinds of mediumship, the Cross Correspondences, Proxy Sittings, Poltergeists
and other expressly stated objective evidence.
The challenger is NOT asked to ‘prove the
negative’ but to rebut the 23 different areas of afterlife evidence
presented in my book. Is that too difficult for this stage magician
to understand?
I state that any 12 year old child of average
intelligence will tell you after reading the challenge that the challenge
is for someone to show that evidence presented in the book A LAWYER
PRESENTS THE CASE FOR THE AFTERLIFE is not correct. It is simple as
that!
When this closed minded-skeptic/materialist JR
wilfully LIES and intentionally MISLEADS the American people about my
offer, then translated, this can only mean that this JR is UNABLE to
rebut the expressly stated evidence for the afterlife as articulated
in my book.
I sent the evidence to some leading scientists
– and not one scientist or any empiricist – or theologian
or philosopher or anybody else has been able to rebut the evidence I
presented for the afterlife.
Why do you think JR will never ever find in favor
of psychic phenomena/afterlife?
Because if he does he
would:
- show he was wrong all the time,
- NOT get funding anymore,
- be abandoned and psychologically beaten into shame,
- become in the eyes of the skeptics, a 'traitor'
- lose any ‘status’ he was able to get and
- become a nobody
- become totally irrelevant
Now do you understand that it is in
this skeptic JR’s interest to continue to DENY the evidence, DENY
the successful psi experiments, DENY empirical mediumship, refuse to
investigate psi properly, to refuse through obfuscation to test the
most brilliant, gifted mediums of to-day, such as John Edward?
Further, the 'new' scientists now tell
us that this JR would not have the technical competence to be impartial
to investigate because of the ‘experimenter effect’ –
basically, whereas impartial empiricists will inevitably find positive
results in a given psi experiment, a negatively prejudiced investigator
will obtain negative results.
Further still and most important,
if he ever accepts psi/afterlife evidence, he will go down as the biggest
fool in American – AND world history!
Do you think this JR can afford
to take that risk?
<< Return to
|
