A
LAWYER ON
THE SKEPTICS by
Victor Zammit Retired Lawyer of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,
and the High Court of Australia
POINT
OF ORDER!
Initially - in 1990 - when
I presented the evidence for the afterlife, I did not say anything
about the 'closed minded skeptics'. I actually ignored them completely.
But I had to reply after their continuous unfair attacks on me
and the afterlife evidence. These uninformed skeptics wilfully,
deliberately and unfairly fundamentally misrepresented my afterlife
evidence. It became impossible to ignore the extreme provocations
- especially by that extroverted closed-minded skeptic from Florida.
He attacked me first, I did not attack any of them. But these
skeptics gave me no choice. I had to show that these uninformed
ignorant skeptics are wrong, why they don't understand what constitutes
admissible afterlife evidence and why they are deliberately misleading
everyone disseminating darkness on a global level.
PSYCHIC DETECTIVES - SKEPTICS FAILED, AGAIN!:
Those closed minded skeptics-cowards have NOT
responded to my evidence that 110 tough, intelligent,
highly skeptical police officers - some of them
chiefs of police CONCEDED - to millions of people of television
viewers around the world - that psychic-mediums DO REALLY HAVE
psychic gifts.See
full report . All these low level skeptics
cowardly avoided responding to my objective and repeatable afterlife
evidence. All they did was to lie, cheat and wilfully misrepresent
my afterlife evidence especially about PSYCHIC DETECTIVES.They
know they are losers and defeatists. The educated, academic skeptics
avoid my material because they know if they try to take me on
it will be instant death to their reputation. If skeptics want
to take me on, I suggest very strongly to ask their attorney to
contact me. I do not correspond with uninformed, low level, uneducated,
semi-literate, closed minded lying skeptics who use dirty, disgusting
language to try to denigrate something they obviously do not understand.
CHALLENGE:
put up or shut up about
......... SENSING MURDER critics It is
so unfair, unreasonable, unjust and plain dirty for these materialist
skeptic critics to use dirty langauge against some of the world's
top forensic psychics of SENSING MURDER. These dirty critics show
they do not have the decency and the intelligence to criticise
mediums without resorting to sewer tactics. 'Projection' tells
us what is in the mind of these critics. The critics' 'empty talk'
is without substance- and full of LIES. So, if you are a materialist
skeptic critic about SENSING MURDER, why not apply to show that
you can come up with some FORTY to EIGHTY hits about a case. I
will compare you using Scientific Method procedure with a gifted
forensic psychic. You and the psychic will be given a photo of
the subject-person, but the photo must be remain face downwards
- that's all you'll get! If you can obtain more hits than the
forensic psychic you get yourself a cool $100,000. But if you
fail, YOU pay the forensic psychic $100,000. That's fair! That
is reasonable, that is just! Put your mouth where you money is
- if you have any!!! email me if you have the courage to take
on SENSING MURDER's gifted forensic psychics - vz@victorzammit.com
(1)
LAWYER’S CROSS-EXAMINATION OF PROFESSOR
STEPHEN HAWKING’S COMMENT ‘THERE IS NO AFTERLIFE’.Here is something of great interest – it is
highly entertaining, amusing,
educational and witty: (Courtroom scene.Professor Hawking
in the witness box being sworn in.) Judge: (looking towards his attendant)
Swear the witness in. Court assistant addressing expert witness
Prof Hawking: “Do you swear to tell the truth, the
whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you God’ Pro Hawking: I don’t believe in God!
Read full cross-examination ... Read
full cross-examination
(2) LAWYER’S CROSS-EXAMINATION
OF CLOSED-MINDED
JAMES RANDI. Significant feedack showed
relative huge interest in cross-examination of selected
people - finding cross-examination very etertaining, and
very witty., : (Courtroom scene.James Randi in
the witness box being sworn in.) Judge: (looking towards his attendant)
Swear the witness in. Court assistant addressing “Do you
swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but
the truth so help you God’ Randi : I don’t believe in God -
you should know that by now ... "
Read full cross-examination:
Part 1Scientists
frauds? Read PART 2 $1m
challenge HOAX Read Part
3
Alpha Project HOAX PART
4 Critical Thinking
HOAX Part
5 Police v Randi Part
6 The 'Carlos HOAX'. Part
7- More
on $1m HOAX Part
8 - Failed
to duplicate the psychics
.. Part
9
-Refuses
to take on psychics' own $1m challenge Part10Magicians accept the paranormal Part
11 Summing up to the jury
AN
OPEN LETTER TO INTERNATIONAL MEDIUMS ALLISION DUBOIS AND
JAMES VAN PRAAGH - three conditions to take on the $1m challenge:
Hello
Allison, hello James,
We’re reading and watching fairly aggressive attacks
by the JREF mob against you - and James Van Praagh on youtubes
to take on his ridiculous bogus challenge when it is impossible
to beat.
Just
for the purpose of the record:
1.
I suggest you refer that aggressive, insulting JREF sidekick
propagandist to me (he has to earn his position as the
second in command at the JREF by attacking the established
mediums). We know it’s all propaganda, but you must
be frustrated with all these unfair attacks on you and James
V P.
FLAMBOYANT DEBUNKER
CAUGHT CHEATING ON TV:
yes, it really happened! This closed
minded cynical debunker from Florida Zwinge randy tried to take
on Don Lane - a brilliant and highly talented American compere
of the then To-Night Show – viewed nationally on Australian
television. The clip has become as one of the most exciting confrontations
in Australian television history. It shows the debunker cheating
- trying to bend a key (to try to denigrate Uri Geller) by pressing
the key on his chair, hoping no one would notice. Enjoy…
http://snipurl.com/t5k3
CHALLENGE TO THE CLOSED-MINDED SKEPTICS
(and those into 'CRITICAL THINKING') : DUPLICATE
WHAT 'MICHELLE WHITEDOVE' DOES AND YOU GET A COOL $500,000!
Got the motivation? Got
the stomach for it? Got the 'critical thinking' ? Is
there a genius closed minded skeptic from Florida or New York,
a genius materialist, a genius reductionist scientist willing
to take up my challenge to duplicate for $500,000
what Michelle Whitedove has done to win Lifetime TV's award
for BEST PSYCHIC IN AMERICA? See for yourself - in the video below-
incredibly accurate psychic skills demonstrated in front of millions.
Closed minded skeptics run miles- all the way to Florida - whenever
she is around. NO FLAMBOYANT SKEPTIC from Florida, NO hard core
closed minded skeptics from the East Coast have beaten her. I
promised the closed minded skeptics $500,000
to duplicate what Michelle Whitedove does under
similar conditions. The only condition is that
the applicant will pay us $500,000 if he fails to perform the
tests. Do NOT be a coward skeptic. Take on the challenge
or just shut up! Watch this truly amazing video of this great
psychic!
'CRITICAL THINKING' SKEPTICS PROTECTING MEDICAL FRAUDS IN AMERICA?
- and in other countries? Why are the so-called "critical
thinking" skeptics protecting
fraudulent medical research? Exposure and subsequent concern over
medical research fraud is on the rise. It's now reached the point
where blogs exist solely to cover retractions of published research.
According to one recent poll for the British Medical Journal,
one in ten scientists and doctors claim to have witnessed colleagues
deliberately fabricating data in order to get their research published.
Thousands of sick people are being killed around the world through
medical fraud- and the closed minded skeptics keep conspicuously
silent. Recently Sixty Minutes in the US exposed one of the greatest
frauds in medical history- Dr Patti. And then
there's Scott S Reuben, a prominent Massachusetts
anesthesiologist who allegedly fabricated 21 medical studies of
painkillers Vivo, Celebes, Extra and Lyrical. Read about ‘autism
researcher’ Paul Hoarsen who was charged
with 13 counts
of wire fraud and nine counts of money laundering – and
allegedly stole over a $1million from autism research funding;
read about Boston University cancer scientist, Sheng Wang,
who fabricated his research findings. His work was published in
two journals in 2009, and he's been ordered to retract them; read
about: Dr. Diederik Stapel who falsified entire
experiments, and several dozen papers which were published in
respected psychology journals and promoted in the mediaiii. And
finally read how in January, resveratrol researcher with the University
of Connecticut, Dipak Das, was found guilty of
145 counts of fabrication and falsification of data published
in 11 different journals.
SO WHERE ARE THE CLOSED-MINDED SKEPTICS-
WHEN YOU NEED THEM? Why
were PAUL KURTZ(now deceased), RANDI, HYMAN, BLACKMORE, WISEMAN
and their other clones as quiet as 'worms'? Why do
these skeptics who for decades have been so loud mouthed in
their attacks on mediums KEEP QUIET
about the brutal killings of innocent sick people? Is it not
HYPOCRISY and the greatest BETRAYAL when these skeptics say
NOTHING about medical fraud which is killing people? Are these
skeptics part of fraudulent medical business? Or too cowardly
and too hypocritical to take on the powerful pharmaceutical
lobby. These skeptics pick on mediums and homoeopaths- who never
hurt anyone - because they are an easy target. Closed minded
keptics remaining silent shows how their claim to be 'promoting
critical thinking' is absolute RUBBISH in practice. It's nothing
but the old magician's trick - 'verbal sleight of hand' to make
idiots out of innocent people - fooling you by lying and misleading
you about the afterlife and the paranormal. And those other
supporters of these closed minded skeptics swallow the hollow
skeptical propaganda hook, line and sinker! A skeptical supporter
'sucker' is born every day! Read article" Is This Fraud
Too Big Even For 60 Minutes?"
ASTRONOMER
CARL SAGAN CONCEDED THE PARANORMAL COULD BE VALID. Contrary
to the closed minded
skeptics who still claim Carl Sagan was a complete anti-paranormal
the evidence shows the complete opposite: that Carl Sagan WAS
accepting the paranormal. This is his own writing, "At the
time of writing there are three claims in the ESP field which
in my opion, deserve serious study:
1. That by
alone humans can affect random number generators in computers,
2. that people under mild sensonsory deprivation can
receive thoughts or images 'projected' at them, and 3. that young children sometimes report the details
of a previous life, which upon checking turn out to be accurate
and which could not hve known about in any other way than reincarnation.
FIFTH BIG WEEEK:
NEW VIDEO- VICTOR ANSWERS A GIANT OF SCIENCE
- how law beats 'science': I
called the most recent video 'WHY PROF.RICHARD
DAWKINS IS WRONG ABOUT THE AFTERLIFE.' In this highly
esoteric subject, I give eight reasons why Prof R Dawkins is wrong.
In point number eight I mention that whilst Dawkins denies 'chance'
plays anything in his theories, reading his works shows that he
claims and imputes that everything came
by chance: the universe, gravity which holds order in the universe,
evolution came by chance, LIFE itself came by chance, the energy
behind evolution, consciousness came by chance - even the order
of an atom came by chance. But NO say the experts, chance explains
nothing. For Dawkins to be taken seriously he has to rebut the
issues I raised in the video - and more! Watch
it now
QUESTION:Hey Victor, why don’t you deface the website of
that king of the skeptics guy from Florida who keeps attacking
you?
Victor: one would have to be
a complete imbecile to deface any website. I am
well above that. I show where, when, how and why this king of
the skeptics from Florida is wrong. When I came on the scene
some 21 years ago, he wanted to know where is the afterlife
evidence? Within an amazing short time I put my afterlife empirical
evidence for public consumption then on the internet. Since
that time no closed minded skeptic, no genius magician or scientist,
no materialist in that time has been able to show where, when,
how and why the evidence I presented was not right. IN fact
a number of scientists state that my afterlife evidence is solid
and objective and repeatable – which means it can NEVER
be rebutted. Defacing his website would mean I failed in my
argument. The fact that no genius scientist or genius skeptic
beat my challenge shows I am on the winning side. Defacing websites
is only for losers and defeatists.
SKEPTICS BLUNDER AGAIN!: Somebody
put me on to the very silly ‘anti-Victor’ website
– run by a couple of uninformed low level closed minded
skeptics who show they know nothing about the rules of professional
debate. They are trying to fool the reader by writing a lot
of rubbish – which is evidence of their sheer stupidity
and colossal ignorance of the rules of debate. The gist of my
argument is that these ignorant skeptics ought to go to expert
litigation lawyers – someone like Rumpole (pictured)
of the Bailey or his equivalent in the United States- to 'Perry
Mason' , - to save them from more humiliation and to advise
them that when the plaintiff (Victor) PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE
(eg, 23 areas of afterlife evidence – see index top right),
the onus shifts on to the defendant skeptic to test the submitted
evidence. It is inadmissible for skeptics to object saying,
“oh, you can’t prove the negative!’ or “tooth
fairies don’t exist’ or 'you can't prove there are
green men on the moon.' GO TO RUMPOLE SKEPTICS, get enlightened
to get it right! … Read more … VICTOR
WILL NOT respond to anyone unless the one who
is attacking shows he has the moral courage to sign his own
name to any article attacking Victor. My view is that it is
cowardice pushed to its extreme for anyone to attack me then
hides behind somebody else's name. Remove your mask! Have the
courage to tell us who you are and inform me of your home address
otherwise I DON'T deal with COWARDS!
IS THE SKEPTIC'S $1M
CHALLENGE THE BIGGEST HOAX IN WORLD HISTORY?
Read more ...
or read the same text below
Why? Because according to the conditions
he himself set up, Zwinge Randi states that in the final
testing of the psychics, ONLY he has the power
to judge whether or not the applicant proved any aspect of the
paranormal. HE IS BEING A JUDGE IN HIS OWN CAUSE!
HE is making the offer, HE drafted the conditions, HE is the
adjudicator, HE is the judge and HE is the jury about an outcome
HE has a huge personal interest in. And HE is the one who said,
"I will always have a way out of paying (any money to any
applicant) ..."
A blatant conflict of interest! What a great joke! He is violating
one of the most important equitable principles we have in the
Western world,"No one is to be a judge in his own cause."
His challenge is absolutely meaningless, a farce and a con on
the American people. Only the low level, hard core closed minded
skeptics swallowed the pernicious propaganda hook, line and
sinker!.
Further, this skeptical debunker is on record (something he
not only did he not denied, but tried to rationalize by stating
words to the effect, "The paranormal does not exist ...")
so read these words very carefully. This is what the debunking
Zwinge Randi told Professor Dennis Rawlings, "I
will always have a way out ..." way out of paying
anything. THAT says it all!!! This guy from Florida has NO credibility
of his alleged challenge at all!!! His alleged challenge is
totally irrelevant and absolutely misleading - designed to fool,
con and deceive the public. Further, no brilliant psychic has
ever reached the final stage. And you wonder why? Gifted psychics
do not accept that the skeptical debunker's challenge is genuine.
When we have 100% proof for the validity of the paranormal and
for the existence of the afterlife - we've seen documentaries
and semi documentaries about the paranormal and the afterlife
every week for years- and spirit contact, why then we do not
have a winner? Zwinge Randi's alleged $1m offer has to be the
greatest HOAX and the biggest JOKE in paranormal history.
Further, this Zwinge has
not added as a most fundamental condition on his website: that
he matches my condition to have a statement on oath - about
the availability of the million dollars - which is subject to
statutory law where the penalty for lying on oath will be up
to five years in prison. Why does he not
have the same condition - the level headed person would conclude,
he's all bulldust - he hasn't got the funding to match his offer.
QUESTION:Victor, a closed minded skeptic I know said there was
no evidence that you were worked as an attorney before your
retirement?
Victor: Of course, you’ll
hear anything from the uninformed
negatively entrenched skeptics - they come up with so much rubbish
because everytime I show by way of objective evidence there
is an afterlife, it makes the materialst/closed minded skeptic
look ridiculous! I worked as an attorney – in Sydney.
Attorneys are also called ‘solicitors’ and ‘barristers.’
I only have space for just one case: I was involved in one of
Australia’s most controversial criminal cases where a
bank robber Dragosevich picked up a hostage in a bank –
and after a fairly long police chase - shots fired - they were
both killed by the police in a roadblock at Fivedock. The hostage's
widow claimed it was the police who shot her innocent husband
through colossal negligence and violation of a prescribed procedure
in these matters. The police claimed it was the bank robber
who shot the hostage. The State government, Mr Neville Wran,
the State’s Premier – the equivalent of a Governor
in the U.S., appointed me to represent the interests of the
hostage's family. The case still remains one of the most controversial
in the history of Australia’s criminal matters. It received
wide media coverage over an extended period of time. Have a
look at one of the reports in the mainstream contemporaneous
newspaper THE SUN about the case - 'DR TO CHECK DEATH
BULLET': Read more
…
THOSE WHO TRY TO ATTACK VICTOR
For those couple of people
who informed me that some mentally imbalanced debunker - apparently
a dummie from a closed-minded debunkers' group, attacked me using
obscene and dirty methods: the attacker knows what he can do I
can do too. He's a dummie skeptic, a nobody. I advise all to ignore
the dummie and forget him altogether. Just leave the low-life
alone. Do NOT give him any attention. He's a loser. He's a defeatist.
He’s nothing, he’s a nobody, he's a non-entity. The record shows
he's pushed cowardice to its extreme. Hugely frustrated because
he does not have the intellect to rebut the afterlife evidence
- so, he throws mud! I'm informed his name sounds like Skunknic.
People tell me 'this mentally deficient imbecile' tries to get
some attention for himself when he tries to attack me - one of
those many who have value - and is regarded as a powerful entity–
otherwise I’d be ignored by the leading debunkers. So I say, leave
him alone, he is projecting the sewer he has in his own mind and
uttering banalities you expect from a loser.Is this the best debunking
the intellectual skeptics can do against my empirical afterlife
evidence?
VICTOR RESPONDS TO THE
U.S. KING OF THE U.S. CLOSED MINDED SKEPTICS. "There
is no afterlife ...why can't psychics go to Las Vegas to win ...
what about the terrorists - 9/11?...Read
more
The most ridiculous
coward academic in the United States: An
associate professor lowering university standards – at
the University of Minnesota Morris: This Associate Professor
shows he’s too cowardly to rebut the empirical evidence
for the afterlife. His attempt to attack me also shows that
this negative debunker does not have the intellect to rebut
my admissible psi empirical evidence - nor does he have the
fortitude to take on my challenge. Otherwise he would have rebutted
the evidence.Read
full article:
A
SEPARATE - $500.000 OFFER TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
Half a million dollars is being
offered by my sponsors to anyone to duplicate our materializations
results and to show why the evidence cannot be admissible evidence
in relation to proving the afterlife - not only to the debunkers
and other materialists, but the offer is open to the most advanced
scientists and anybody else in the world to-day including those
anti-materializations 'spiritualits'. But if the applicant fails,
a legal requirement is that the applicant will have to hand over
half a million dollars to the Circle of the Silver Cord. After
eighteen long months, no materialist genius, no scientist, no
physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no debunker has been
able to rebut the most important afterlife evidence in human history.
Got the motivation? Got the courage? Got the stomach for it? I'M
WAITING FOR YOU!!!
WHY
HAS NO ONE BEATEN YOUR MATERIALIZASTION $500,000 OFFER VICTOR?
This is because the Circle of the Silver Cord (COSC) has the most
professional team in the history of materializations.
The COSC has professionally qualified and highly experienced experts
in fraud detection - (ex-intelligence and police officers), has
a professionally qualified psychologist with expertise in Scientific
Method and there is expertise in the legal admissibility of evidence.
To my knowledge there has never
been at any time in history a non-religious clinical materialization
Circle which has so many professionals with relevant professional
expertise and extensive relevant experience - more than fifteen
months of regular weekly materializations. You understand why
no materialist closed minded skeptic or anybody else will not
take me on?
*************************
Victor Zammit rebuts Zwinge
Randi
J
(Zwinge) Randi Attacks Lawyer Victor Zammit –
Victor’s
Rebuttal : Someone sent me Victor an email that
James Zwinge Randi, (hereinafter JZR) had some fifteen
articles attacking me. Why is JZR wrong and most unfair and unjust
in his attempt to maliciously attack me? Why is he so hugely frustrated,
why is he fuming with anger, why is he so venomously aggressive
against me and psi experts and gifted mediums? Why does he bother
with having the greatest hoax in paranormal history?
1. Failure to beat my challenge.
More than seven years ago JZR implied he was going to take me
on regarding the ONE MILLION DOLLARS for anyone to show that my
objective empirical evidence has no validity. That was over seven
years ago, I AM STILL WAITING!! And anything which has not been
rebutted will stay valid until it is rebutted. If empirical afterlife
evidence cannot be rebutted it will stay valid – permanently.
His refusal to even try on his claimed basis that, “You
can’t prove the negative” is invalid, illegitimate,
unacceptable and worthless – not consistent with the professional
rules of debate see below.
2. JZR is
allegedly a stage magician – JZR is NOT a scientist,
he is not an empiricist, he is not a scholar or an intellectual
or a researcher. He has NO formalized learning regarding experimentation.
He never had any of his writings referred to by academic scientists
or scholars. In fact his conduct shows him to be a conman, a mind-manipulator
and someone who himself admits to being highly skilled in deception,
trickery and conning.
Read full report ....
*****************************
QUESTION OF THE WEEK: (received
yesterday) why is it that a mentally queer guy debunker attacked
you?
Victor: They attack me through sheer extreme
frustration that they have been unable to rebut my empirically
elicited objective evidence for the existence of the afterlife.
After EIGHT long years – no debunking closed minded skeptic,
no scientist, no negative empiricist has been able to show that
my expressly stated evidence is invalid. The objective afterlife
evidence and the positive results of the gifted mediums are making
these debunkers look absolutely stupid and utterly ridiculous!
Information came to me that one of the materialist/debunkers –
someone I’m informed is called ‘Skunknic’ (?)
who blasphemed, and used gutter level language is acting as if
he's actually ‘mentally sick.’ – I will not
engage with mentally sick people – he needs psychiatric
treatment urgently. I’ll rattle his cage if I want to hear
from him!
The 'EXPERIMENTER
EFFECT.'
The negatively minded
skeptical experimenter will obtain negative results in psychic
experiments notwithstanding other empiricists considered to be
'neutral' obtain positive results doing the same experiments.
This is most relevant for those who genuinely want to test gifted
psychics. See a most interesting example of the EXPERIMENTER EFFECT
> Dr. Marilyn Schlitz neutral experimenter obtained positive
results and Dr Richard Wiseman, who has a historical track record
of finding against psychics - doing the same experiment as Dr
Schlitz consistently obtained negative results - see the the University
of Freiburg Studies and Mick O’Neil’s analysis of
Wiseman’s experimental style - last time was seen on: http://www.forteantimes.com/artic/espcrit/espcrit.html
Scientific skepticism
" There is no more honourable word in the
scientific lexicon that that of 'skeptic' -- one who sincerely
seeks after truth and who has the courage to rebut scientific
myths and false beliefs with empirical data and sound logic."So
begins Richard Milton's excellent article On
Skepticism..
Victor Zammit: A Lawyer Rebuts Dr G.M.
Woerlee, NDE DebunkerL Anti-afterlife debunker G.M. Woerlee
from Holland attempts to debunk Near Death Experiences by way
of his book, by what he writes on his website and by the lectures
he has given to the skeptics. Initially: what do his works reveal?
Read more …
THE UNBELIEVER':
"There will never be enough evidence
for those who don't want to accept the evidence." How true!
I came across someone who is either too uninformed
or blatantly against materializations or blatantly mischievous
- and someone who never ever participated in David Thompson's
materializations - and who states that no spirit ever materialized
- became solid - in David materialization. But all those who attended
David's materialization will tell you that many times William,
David's guide, materializes walks around the seance room even
puts his hand on some people. He put his solid hand on my shoulder
when I first attended David's materializations meeting. William
is a very tall man with very heavy footsteps - probably wearing
size 14 shoes. OK, I tell this mischievous unbeliever, would he
be prepared to attend one session, opens his legs wide, stands
in the front row, with his hands hehind, and allow William to
give this unbeliever a kick between his legs as if William was
going to kick a football to score a goal from some fifty meters
away. This is a matter of telling this mischievous guy to put
up or shut up!
ON EVIDENCE; ‘PROVING
THE NEGATIVE’: re - this
week’s new video on youtube – SKEPTICS DEMOLISHED
– objection number 3. That flamboyant guy from Florida Randi
for years stated that, “no one can prove Victor Zammit’s
afterlife evidence because ‘no one can prove the negative.’!!
That is irrelevant in professional debate. Why? Because this closed
minded skeptic is saying that he ‘cannot prove that the
afterlife does not exist.’ That statement is immediately
made INVALID when I presented some 23 areas of afterlife EVIDENCE
for the existence of the afterlife. This skeptic does NOT have
to prove anything – all he has to do is to rebut MY evidence-
WHERE, WHEN, HOW and WHY the evidence I presented is not right.
Further, there is not only my evidence I presented, there are
at least a thousand investigators around the world who produced
their own afterlife evidence. Also there have been some of the
most intelligent scientists and professionals who walked on this
planet earth early last century (Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William
Barrett, Sir William Crookes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle et al) who
AFTER they empirically investigated the afterlife, they conceded
the afterlife evidence is absolutely irrefutable. So that the
statement that no one can prove the afterlife does not exist (no
one can prove the negative) is absolutely irrelevant, immaterial,
inadmissible and invalid. Information reached me that closed minded
guy from Florida does NO LONGER state ‘you can’t prove
the negative’ in relation to the existence of the afterlife.
Only some skeptics in Europe – in Italy, a few in Austria
and a couple in Denmark have not woken up to professional debate
to drop the absolute nonsense ‘you can’t prove the
negative.’
CLOSED
MINDED JREF AND BRITISH SKEPTIC WISEMANATTACKED BY PROFESSIONAL DR J SIQUEIRA: Closed
minded JREF and British psychologist attacked for their alleged
cheating, deceit and for trying to negatively influence people
that there is no afterlife and there is no paranormal. This is
notwithstanding that no skeptics has NOT been able to rebut the
objective and repeatable evidence for the afterlife and has NOT
rebutted the huge scientific evidence for the paranormal. As I
stated before, this closed minded skeptic guy Wiseman could have
been sued for some $5 MILLION by Russian Natasha Demkina for negatively
manipulating the experiment with her. On crossing over we are
almost certain these cruel closed minded skeptics will end down
in the dark afterlife realm for thousands of years continuing
to deny there is an afterlife. Here are some close observations
of these closed minded skeptics who are spreading darkness around
the world: http://youtu.be/649ulRTlkx0
One
million dollars is offered to any closed minded
skeptic who can rebut the existing evidence for
the afterlife. Read
more...
Closed-minded
skeptics and other materialists: some of those whom
are psychologists, ex-magicians, biologists, physicists
and others, have miserably failed
to technically rebut the expressly stated evidence
for the existence of the afterlife.
By
contrast, more scientists, more physicists, more
psychologists and more people in the professions
and others are conceding the empirical evidence
for the afterlife is just irrefutable.
***Victor
Zammit has the only $1 million challenge in the
world guaranteed by way of a legal document on oath
which is subject to up to five years imprisonment
if the funding does not exist.
The skeptic with the alleged one million dollar
challenge has refused to match my guarantee! An
interpretation of this is that he's fooling the
public that he has the funding to support the challenge.
The Miami materialist J Zwinge R Clock began
in April 2001!! Since then this materialist,
closed minded skeptic has refused to rebut my objective evidence
for the afterlife. My evidence is EXPRESSLY STATED - 23 areas
of evidence for the existence of the afterlife.
COLOSSAL SKEPTICS’ FAILURES:
(1) THE ALPHA PROJECT – LIES,
CHEATING AND MISCHIEF: the most
shameful, disgusting skeptical fraud in
history: some skeptics think this project - when a closed minded
skeptic concocted to infiltrate two dummy skeptics into a psychic
research project – was a great success. Absolute nonsense!
These two infiltrators lied, cheated, pretended to be psychics
when they were closed minded skeptics to fool, to mislead, to
willfully misdirect the psychic experiment. You call that successful?
– by lying and cheating and negatively manipulating the
circumstances to prevent the truth from being discovered? It was
a disgusting fraud - manipulated to fundamentally mislead the
professional experimenters who were conducted a legitimate experiment
about psychic phenomena. The Alpha Project will go down in history
as the most shameful and most disgusting concocted fraud in history
organized by the closed minded J Randi.
SKEPTICS’ HOAXES
(2) The ‘Carlos’ affair: in 1988 closed
minded skeptic J Randi planned a hoax to deceive the Australian
people. (picture: the longer the nose the bigger the lies)
He was able to get some guy Jose Alverez to claim that
he was channeling some spirit called ‘Carlos.’ What
was not anticipated by the closed minded skeptic is that Australians
generally are perhaps ten times more skeptical than any other
race on earth. The journalists are perhaps a hundred times more
skeptical than anybody else. Now this guy Randi thought he could
deceive, fool and make idiots out of these highly skeptical Australians.
What happened? After the show at the Opera House, this cheat Alvarez
was cross-examined by tough Australian journalists – who
literally tore him apart and uncovered his fraud. So much so,
that this Alvarez's manager, during the interview threw a glass
of water on tough investigative journalist George Negus because
Alvarez could not withstand the tough questioning and RAN AWAY
from the interview!! But the end result was a huge failure for
the closed minded skeptics, for Randi, for Alvarez and for the
cheats and conmen of this world.
WHY SOME CLOSED-MINDED SKEPTICS WILL NEVER
ACCEPT THE PARANORMAL AND THE AFTERLIFE EVIDENCE:
Because of
the attacks on highly gifted internationally recognized forensic
psychic-mediums, I have written a short article to help them -
and others - understand why 'closed-minded' skeptics are stubborn
in not accepting the objective and repeatable evidence for the
paranormal and the afterlife. I explain the following: Read artice
... 1. 'Cognitive Dissonance', 2. Cathexis,
3. Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP),
4. Environmental programming,
5. Brain decoding existing prejudices
6. Career advancement, money, power and status. 7.THE
'SMORGASBORD' ARGUMENT. Read
article ...
Professor Stephen Hawking, the astronomer, is most notorious
for using this 'SMORGASBORD' argument - picking and using only
the information that substantiates his own negative prejudices.
This closed -minded skeptical professor does not know that in
a court-room situation his 'smorgasbord argument' would be torn
to shreds. Why? Because he would be cross-examined on the critical,
most vital evidence that he deletes - that fundamentally contradicts
his deeply entrenched negative prejudices. This closed-skeptical
scientist makes a huge error thinking that he is an expert in
law as well. Wrong! A litigation lawyer has exclusive technical
knowledge of what is relevant, what is evidentiary what is essential
admissible evidence - certainly not an astronomer! Read
article ...
QUESTION:Hey Victor,
why don’t you deface the website of that king of the skeptics
guy from Florida who keeps on attacking you -they way some skeptic
idiot defaced your website?
Victor: one would have to be
a complete imbecile to deface any website. I am well above that.
I show where, when, how and why this king of the skeptics from
Florida is wrong. When I came on the scene some 21 years ago,
he wanted to know where is the afterlife evidence? Within an amazing
short time I put my empirical evidence for public consumption
then on the internet. Since that time no closed minded skeptic,
no genius magician or genius reductionist-scientist, no materialist
in that time has been able to show where, when, how and why the
evidence I presented was not right. IN fact a number of scientists
state that my afterlife evidence is solid and objective and repeatable
– which means it can NEVER be rebutted. Defacing his website
would mean I failed in my argument. The fact that no genius scientist
or genius skeptic beat my challenge shows I am on the winning
side. Defacing websites is only for losers and defeatists.
COMMENTARY: TIME FOR THIS
PSI-IGNORANT HARVARD PROFESSOR TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
It is time to take on this uninformed psi-ignorant Harvard Prof
Pinker in a serious way. I find it shocking that TIME magazine
allowed descriptive – unsubstantiated writings in the endeavor
to invalidate the existing irrefutable evidence for psi and the
afterlife.
I am more than happy to challenge
this professionally uninformed Professor: I will donate half a
million dollars to his department if he can show that what we
are doing – communicating with afterlife entities in materialization
experiments- is not coming from the afterlife dimension –
from existing minds outside the physical brain.
Also, he has to rebut the empirical
psi evidence validating communicating with inter-dimensional entities.
If he fails, he has to hand over
to the Circle of the Silver Cord (seven open-minded skeptical
investigators) half a million dollars for their empirical research.
It is a matter of telling this reductionist professor who is inexorably
lowering the standards of psychology at Harvard to put up or shut
up.
Notwithstanding there may be laws
regarding ‘betting’ in some countries, we hereinabove
are talking about ‘donations.’
I am not at this stage calling this
Professor Pinker an intellectual and a morally coward. We’ll
see if he has the fortitude to respond!
(The above was sent to the Prof et
al 25th January 07).
AN AFTERTHOUGHT:
So this Harvard Professor, in a cowardly way writes to TIME magazine
to knowingly denigrate, disparage and malign the brilliant paranormal
work of those scientists – such as Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir
William Barrett, Sir William Crookes and brilliant researcher/writer
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle of the old school. He also denigrates the
empirical work being done by the Circle of the Silver Cord. This
professor exhibits professional ignorance about what is happening
in the world to-day in empirically validated communication experiments
with afterlife entities. He, like other closed minded skeptics,
has NOT done any research at all and rudely spouts his negative
prejudice to satisfy his own negative partiality. I call that
professional negligence. Will he prove to be a coward or will
he show he has the moral courage to stand up for what he wrote
against the validity of the paranormal?
***********************
DEPENDENT VARIABLE?
When J Zwinge R who claims
to have been a stage magician emailed me a couple of years ago
he implied that he was qualified to do experiments and test psychics
using empirical methods. I tested him by asking him what was a
'dependent variable' in empirical testing. He said he would reply
to me. Seven years later, I am still waiting for his answer!!
'The Ultimate Psychic Challenge' was filmed
in London recently, early August, in 'London Television Studios.'
Zwinge Randi, the notorious closed minded skeptic was caught cheating
and trying to deceive and con the public that he was a medium.
His performance to cheat, mislead and deceive was so bad, so embarrassing,
the producers had to stop the show - this segment edited out,
otherwise the show would be perceived as absolute rubbish. Zwinge
Randi some are now claiming to be the biggest laughing stock in
the history of psychic phenomena - read a report by one of the
most incisive psi assessors in the world and who has the highest
credibility MONTAGUE KEEN: read
more...
A FUNNY WAY ON HOW TO DEBUNK JUST ABOUT
ANYTHING 1. Before commencing to debunk, prepare your
equipment. Equipment needed: one armchair. 2. Put on the right face. Cultivate a condescending
air that suggests that your personal opinions are backed by the
full faith and credit of God. Employ vague, subjective, dismissive
terms such as ‘ridiculous’ or "trivial"
in a manner that suggests they have the full force of scientific
authority. 3. Portray science not as an open-ended process
of discovery but as a holy war against unruly hordes of quackery-
worshipping infidels. Since in war the ends justify the means,
you may fudge, stretch or violate the scientific method, or even
omit it entirely, in the name of defending the scientific method.
4. Keep your arguments as abstract and theoretical
as possible. This will "send the message" that accepted
theory overrides any actual evidence that might challenge it--and
that therefore no such evidence is worth examining. 5.Reinforce the popular misconception that certain
subjects are inherently unscientific. In other words, deliberately
confuse the *process* of science with the *content* of science.
(Someone may, of course, object that since science is a universal
approach to truth-seeking it must be neutral to subject matter;
hence, only the investigative *process* can be scientifically
responsible or irresponsible. If that happens, dismiss such objections
using a method employed successfully by generations of politicians:
simply reassure everyone that "there is no contradiction
here!"). By Daniel Drasin – he’s is a writer
and media producer based in the San Francisco Bay Area.Full report:
http://snipurl.com/17que or http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html
THE 1,000 POUND STERLING CHALLENGE FARCE!
Sometime ago some non-entity, he's not a professional,
not an investigator, not a medium, not an empiricist, not qualified
in any discipline - he's a van driver from England who tried to
challenge me when I have a HALF A MILLION DOLLARS challenge to
anyone who could show why the Circle of the Silver Cord, inter
alia, is not genuine. His challenge was so silly and ridiculous
I just gave his stupid 1,000 pounds sterling no time at all –
it just fizzled out to nothing. But because the anti-materialization
attacker imputed that the members of the Circle of the Silver
Cord (COSC) and I are not qualified, for the purpose of informing
any new comers to the materialization scene I decided to give
information about how qualified the COSC – there are those
who were professional law investigators - at least one of them
had 20 years intelligence experience, a former police officers,
two psychologists with formal qualifications in Scientific Method,
a retired attorney with expertise in the admissibility of evidence,
a tough journalist, one medium – and others – probably
the most professional materialization investigation group in the
history of empirical materializations. Read more about this uninformed
skeptic ...
BREAKING THE HOUDINI CODE:
What
evidence is there to show that Houdini transmitted the agreed
code from the afterlife to his wife?
Victor: Houdini was a crusader
against fake mediums early last century – but vowed that
if there is an afterlife, on crossing over he would transmit a
message by way of a code to his wife Beatrice. And the agreed
code did come through! There were a number of people present including
reporters from “The Scientific American”, Houdini’s
wife and other witnesses. Houdini’s code word related from
the afterlife was BELIEVE – as you will read in the article,
it was a rather complex message. And the code word from Houdini’s
mother related from the afterlife was ‘FORGIVE’. Houdini’s
wife Beatrice stated that no one else in the world knew about
the code. She signed a formal statement to the effect that the
code came from Houdini and was absolutely correct. Naturally the
closed minded, aggressive skeptics went on a rampage, using violent
tactics to claim that Beatrice was lying and the medium was fraudulent.
But to no avail. Houdini’s wife Beatrice stood by what she
experienced. ... Read
more... (The latest: At the moment, there is a private committee
in the United States trying to investigate his cause of death
in the 1920's - even trying to exhume his body -- one of the skeptical
debunkers claiming he was poisoned by the 'Spiritualists' - and
even very naively trying to blame Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for his
murder!!!!!)
COMMENTARY: Closed minded investigator
in England EXPOSED by Chris Carter! It
is really sad to see these materialists using closed minded
psychologist as a puppet to do the dirty work for materialism.
He pops up on British television screens occasionally to push
something ridiculous for the materialists. This stooge is using
his professional qualifications to denigrate, demean and to try
to destroy honest, paranormally gifted people - such as a young
girl I mentioned years ago, then 17 year old
Russian medical intuitive Natasha Demkina. Natasha could
have sued him for at least $3 to $5 MILLION for trying to
cause irreparable harm to her reputation. Even Nobel Laureate
Professor Brian Josephson demonstrated that this negative psychologist
was WRONG in his calculations and that Natasha's results could
not have been acheived by chance. This was in spite of the fact
that the design of the experimental protocols were deliberately
and knowingly changed during the testing to bring about negative
results. This closed minded skeptic also tries to rubbish the
brilliant work of Dr Rupert Sheldrake ...
Now author Chris Carter has brilliantly EXPOSED the dirty
tricks of this closed-minded psychologust in his latest article
in the Journal for Psychical Research “Heads I Lose,
Tails You Win.”Read
more ...
WHERE
IS THE EVIDENCE?: Idiocy
pushed to its extreme by the uninformed? I do not debate the monkey
– get the organ grinder whenever he gets enough courage
to tell us who he is! There appears to be a low intelligence anti-materialization
objector being used by some coward-in-hiding - who is totally
out of his depth and who keeps on hammering and badgering about
"where is the evidence Victor?" referring to David Thompson’s
materializations. This anti-materialization objector who has never
ever attended a David Thompson materialization and who appears
to be very slow in understanding when we ALWAYS state:"We
do NOT guarantee that ALL those who materialize are who they claim
to be!" But, he challenges us about proving that those
who come through are who they claim to be! We are professionals
who investigated David Thompson on a weekly basis for fifteen
months. We are university trained in the admissibility of evidence
backed with practical experience in the Magistrates', District
and the Supreme Courts; two of us investigating David have professional
qualifications and professional experience in Scientific Method,
and two are also professional psychologists. I am informed that
this objector is a manual worker - and I have absolutely nothing
against manual workers - except this guy is out of his depth!.
So, if you read ‘Where is the Evidence Victor’ have
pity on someone who is making a fool of himself and who is well
and truly of his depth.
VICTOR AT SPEAKERS CORNER:
John Webster
from the UK and Victor Zammit from Sydney, Australia, were the
only two speakers in the history of the Speakers' Corner who consistently
attracted huge, record crowds. For many years Victor dealt with
all relevant topics - political, social, religious, revolutionary
dialectics, women's role in society, the Churches, the New Age..
What you will see was taken over thirty five years ago - from
8mm hand camera - the time before DVD's and video were in existence.
See for yourself" Victor
Zammit speaking at Speakers Corner (New)
SOME OF THOSE WHO SHOW WHY
CLOSED-MINDED RANDI'S CHALLENGE IS ABSULUTELY RIDICULOUS: