Victor
A LAWYER ON THE SKEPTICS
by Victor Zammit
Retired Lawyer of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,
and the High Court of Australia
.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO BE CALLED A 'SKEPTIC'?

I totally agree with the late Professor Truzzi that a skeptic is one who ‘doubts’ NOT one who ‘denies.’

To-day’s usage of the word skeptic refers to a critic who ‘denies’ – the non-belief approach. The original meaning of a skeptic was one who doubts, one who questions, one who uses critical thinking - certainly NOT one who DENIES. I submit that the legitimate description of a closed-minded skeptic is a 'materialist.'

Throughout the twentieth century the negatively prejudiced critics hijacked the word 'skeptic' and used it to mean someone who actually denies anything than can be denied.

The skeptics became divided into at least two camps: the closed-minded and the open-minded skeptics.

The closed-minded skeptics are similar to the materialists – those who actually DENY beliefs: unless you can see it, touch it, hear it, taste or smell it – classical materialism – then it cannot be accepted.

Basically, the open minded skeptic, as I am, is someone who initially does not accept any belief, but on investigating accepts a particular phenomenon if it can be ‘proved,’ can be independently substantiated.

By proved – if a given formula is given and yields the same results over time and space, that phenomena is accepted and removes all skepticism about the phenomenon.

<< Return to A Lawyer on The Skeptics

Copyright © 2001 Victor Zammit.  All rights reserved.  --