|
A CLOSED-MINDED SKEPTIC
WHO IS DELUDING HIMSELF
- AND OTHERS!
One
of the most flamboyant but extremely negatively prejudiced closed
minded skeptic/materialist who lives in Miami is J Randi. This
man I call JR is either too ignorant to read plain English to
understand the $1m challenge or he is knowingly, willfully and
maliciously misleading the American and other people about my
offer of the aforesaid $1m. The only reason why he will be doing
this is because this JR cannot rebut the evidence for the afterlife!
There is no other explanation.
In
response to the evidence I have in my book on the Net, this JR
mistakenly stated publicly no one can ‘prove the negative.’
To
willfully mislead JR conveniently ignores the expressly stated
evidence I presented for the existence of the afterlife.
Now
if you investigate my evidence for the existence of the afterlife,
you will see at least 23 different areas of what the courts call
expressly stated ‘objective evidence.’
You
will come across the Electronic Voice Phenomena, the Instrumental
Transcommunication, the SCOLE Experiments, different kinds of
mediumship, the Cross Correspondences, Proxy Sittings, Poltergeists
and other expressly stated objective evidence.
The
challenger is NOT asked to ‘prove the negative’ but
to rebut the 23 different areas of afterlife evidence presented
in my book. Is that too difficult for this stage magician to understand?
I
state that any 12 year old child of average intelligence will
tell you after reading the challenge that the challenge is for
someone to show that evidence presented in the book A LAWYER PRESENTS
THE CASE FOR THE AFTERLIFE is not correct. It is simple as that!
When
this closed minded-skeptic/materialist JR wilfully LIES and intentionally
MISLEADS the American people about my offer, then translated,
this can only mean that this JR is UNABLE to rebut the expressly
stated evidence for the afterlife as articulated in my book.
I
sent the evidence to some leading scientists – and not one
scientist or any empiricist – or theologian or philosopher
or anybody else has been able to rebut the evidence I presented
for the afterlife.
Why
do you think JR will never ever find in favor of psychic phenomena/afterlife?
Because
if he does he would:
-
show he was wrong all the time,
- NOT get funding anymore,
- be abandoned and psychologically beaten into shame,
- become in the eyes of the skeptics, a 'traitor'
- lose any ‘status’ he was able to get and
- become a nobody
- become totally irrelevant
Now
do you understand that it is in this skeptic JR’s interest
to continue to DENY the evidence, DENY the successful psi experiments,
DENY empirical mediumship, refuse to investigate psi properly,
to refuse through obfuscation to test the most brilliant, gifted
mediums of to-day, such as John Edward?
Further,
the 'new' scientists now tell us that this JR would not have the
technical competence to be impartial to investigate because of
the ‘experimenter effect’ – basically, whereas
impartial empiricists will inevitably find positive results in
a given psi experiment, a negatively prejudiced investigator will
obtain negative results.
Further
still and most important, if he ever accepts psi/afterlife evidence,
he will go down as the biggest fool in American – AND world
history!
Do
you think this JR can afford to take that risk?
<< Return to
|
