Victor
A LAWYER ON THE SKEPTICS
by Victor Zammit
Retired Lawyer of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,
and the High Court of Australia
.

Victor Zammit

" Unlike scientism -( the dogmatic belief in existing materialist orthodox science), science in the true sense of the word is open to unbiased investigation of any existing phenomena". Prof Stanislav Grof

A lawyer rebuts the giants of materialist science and negative empiricists - psychologists and other skeptics:

  • Professor Carl Sagan
  • Professor Richard Dawkins
  • professor's attack on EVP
  • psychologist on NDEs
  • Professor R Hyman
  • Have the debunkers lost credibility in PSI?
  • Natasha Demkina can sue
  • the debunkers who attacked Sir William Crookes


    FLAMBOYANT DEBUNKER CAUGHT CHEATING ON TV:     yes, it really happened! This closed minded cynical debunker from Florida Zwinge randy tried to take on Don Lane - a brilliant and highly talented American compere of the then To-Night Show – viewed nationally on Australian television. The clip has become as one of the most exciting confrontations in Australian television history. It shows the debunker cheating - trying to bend a key (to try to denigrate Uri Geller) by pressing the key on his chair, hoping no one would notice. Enjoy… http://snipurl.com/t5k3

    SKEPTICS BLUNDER AGAIN!: Somebody put me on to the very silly ‘anti-Victor’ website – run by a couple of uninformed low level closed minded skeptics who show they know nothing about the rules of professional debate. They are trying to fool the reader by writing a lot of rubbish – which is evidence of their sheer stupidity and colossal ignorance of the rules of debate. The gist of my argument is that these ignorant skeptics ought to go to expert litigation lawyers – someone like Rumpole (pictured) of the Bailey or his equivalent in the United States- to 'Perry Mason' , - to save them from more humiliation and to advise them that when the plaintiff (Victor) PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE (eg, 23 areas of afterlife evidence – see index top right), the onus shifts on to the defendant skeptic to test the submitted evidence. It is inadmissible for skeptics to object saying, “oh, you can’t prove the negative!’ or “tooth fairies don’t exist’ or 'you can't prove there are green men on the moon.' GO TO RUMPOLE SKEPTICS, get enlightened to get it right! … Read more …

     VICTOR WILL NOT respond to anyone unless the one who is attacking shows he has the moral courage to sign his own name to any article attacking Victor. My view is that it is cowardice pushed to its extreme for anyone to attack me then hides behind somebody else's name. Remove your mask! Have the courage to tell us who you are and inform me of your home address otherwise I DON'T deal with COWARDS!

    IRRELEVANCE EVEN IF SKEPTIC HAS $1M FOR HIS ALLEGED CHALLENGE! Even if we accept that this skeptic guy from Florida has on paper the one million for his alleged challenge – that is absolutely meaningless. OK, let's assume JREF does have the funding for the alleged challenge. Any smart lawyer, any devious accountant will be able to show the JREF how NOT to pay the $1m legally if and when some applicant beat the challenge. I certainly can show how to legally JREF does not have to pay a cent of the promised million dollars – all would be legal! That is why in my offer, I give a guarantee that if any skeptic beats my challenge I have to pay up or go to prison for some 5 years. That is what we want JRand to do: on oath to guarantee payment when the applicant beats the challenge. But this JR emailed me – at first and said he was going to do that – then reneged on his promise, wanting me to draft the statement on oath for him!. That I could not because I cannot intrude into American law. It is JR’s responsibility, if he is honest about this, to get his lawyer to draft something simple but legally enforceable. This he FAILED to do … which reminds us what Prof Dennis Rawlings told us about JR, that JR will ALWAYS have a way out … of paying anything!!!!!!!!!!!


  • IS THE SKEPTIC'S $1M CHALLENGE THE BIGGEST HOAX IN WORLD HISTORY? Read more ...

    or read the same text below

    Why? Because according to the conditions he himself set up, Zwinge Randi states that in the final testing of the psychics, ONLY he has the power to judge whether or not the applicant proved any aspect of the paranormal. HE IS BEING A JUDGE IN HIS OWN CAUSE!

    HE is making the offer, HE drafted the conditions, HE is the adjudicator, HE is the judge and HE is the jury about an outcome HE has a huge personal interest in. And HE is the one who said, "I will always have a way out of paying (any money to any applicant) ..."

    A blatant conflict of interest! What a great joke! He is violating one of the most important equitable principles we have in the Western world,"No one is to be a judge in his own cause." His challenge is absolutely meaningless, a farce and a con on the American people. Only the low level, hard core closed minded skeptics swallowed the pernicious propaganda hook, line and sinker!.

    Further, this skeptical debunker is on record (something he not only did he not denied, but tried to rationalize by stating words to the effect, "The paranormal does not exist ...") so read these words very carefully. This is what the debunking Zwinge Randi told Professor Dennis Rawlings, "I will always have a way out ..." way out of paying anything. THAT says it all!!! This guy from Florida has NO credibility of his alleged challenge at all!!! His alleged challenge is totally irrelevant and absolutely misleading - designed to fool, con and deceive the public. Further, no brilliant psychic has ever reached the final stage. And you wonder why? Gifted psychics do not accept that the skeptical debunker's challenge is genuine. When we have 100% proof for the validity of the paranormal and for the existence of the afterlife - we've seen documentaries and semi documentaries about the paranormal and the afterlife every week for years- and spirit contact, why then we do not have a winner? Zwinge Randi's alleged $1m offer has to be the greatest HOAX and the biggest JOKE in paranormal history.

    Further    , this Zwinge has not added as a most fundamental condition on his website: that he matches my condition to have a statement on oath - about the availability of the million dollars - which is subject to statutory law where the penalty for lying on oath will be up to five years in prison. Why does he not have the same condition - the level headed person would conclude, he's all bulldust - he hasn't got the funding to match his offer!

  • QUESTION: Victor, a closed minded skeptic I know said there was no evidence that you were worked as an attorney before your retirement?

    Victor: Of course, you’ll hear anything from the uninformed negatively entrenched skeptics - they come up with so much rubbish because everytime I show by way of objective evidence there is an afterlife, it makes the materialst/closed minded skeptic look ridiculous! I worked as an attorney – in Sydney. Attorneys are also called ‘solicitors’ and ‘barristers.’ I only have space for just one case: I was involved in one of Australia’s most controversial criminal cases where a bank robber Dragosevich picked up a hostage in a bank – and after a fairly long police chase - shots fired - they were both killed by the police in a roadblock at Fivedock. The hostage's widow claimed it was the police who shot her innocent husband through colossal negligence and violation of a prescribed procedure in these matters. The police claimed it was the bank robber who shot the hostage. The State government, Mr Neville Wran, the State’s Premier – the equivalent of a Governor in the U.S., appointed me to represent the interests of the hostage's family. The case still remains one of the most controversial in the history of Australia’s criminal matters. It received wide media coverage over an extended period of time. Have a look at one of the reports in the mainstream contemporaneous newspaper THE SUN about the case - 'DR TO CHECK DEATH BULLET': Read more …

    THOSE WHO TRY TO ATTACK VICTOR

         For those couple of people who informed me that some mentally imbalanced debunker - apparently a dummie from a closed-minded debunkers' group, attacked me using obscene and dirty methods: the attacker knows what he can do I can do too. He's a dummie skeptic, a nobody. I advise all to ignore the dummie and forget him altogether. Just leave the low-life alone. Do NOT give him any attention. He's a loser. He's a defeatist. He’s nothing, he’s a nobody, he's a non-entity. The record shows he's pushed cowardice to its extreme. Hugely frustrated because he does not have the intellect to rebut the afterlife evidence - so, he throws mud! I'm informed his name sounds like Skunknic. People tell me 'this mentally deficient imbecile' tries to get some attention for himself when he tries to attack me - one of those many who have value - and is regarded as a powerful entity– otherwise I’d be ignored by the leading debunkers. So I say, leave him alone, he is projecting the sewer he has in his own mind and uttering banalities you expect from a loser.Is this the best debunking the intellectual skeptics can do against my empirical afterlife evidence?


    VICTOR RESPONDS TO THE U.S. KING OF THE U.S. CLOSED MINDED SKEPTICS.     "There is no afterlife ...why can't psychics go to Las Vegas to win ... what about the terrorists - 9/11? ...Read more…
  • The most ridiculous coward academic in the United States: An associate professor lowering university standards – at the University of Minnesota Morris: This Associate Professor shows he’s too cowardly to rebut the empirical evidence for the afterlife. His attempt to attack me also shows that this negative debunker does not have the intellect to rebut my admissible psi empirical evidence - nor does he have the fortitude to take on my challenge. Otherwise he would have rebutted the evidence. Read full article:

A SEPARATE - $500.000 OFFER TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! Half a million dollars is being offered by my sponsors to anyone to duplicate our materializations results and to show why the evidence cannot be admissible evidence in relation to proving the afterlife - not only to the debunkers and other materialists, but the offer is open to the most advanced scientists and anybody else in the world to-day including those anti-materializations 'spiritualits'. But if the applicant fails, a legal requirement is that the applicant will have to hand over half a million dollars to the Circle of the Silver Cord. After eighteen long months, no materialist genius, no scientist, no physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no debunker has been able to rebut the most important afterlife evidence in human history. Got the motivation? Got the courage? Got the stomach for it? I'M WAITING FOR YOU!!!

WHY HAS NO ONE BEATEN YOUR MATERIALIZASTION $500,000 OFFER VICTOR? This is because the Circle of the Silver Cord (COSC) has the most professional team in the history of materializations. The COSC has professionally qualified and highly experienced experts in fraud detection - (ex-intelligence and police officers), has a professionally qualified psychologist with expertise in Scientific Method and there is expertise in the legal admissibility of evidence. To my knowledge there has never been at any time in history a non-religious clinical materialization Circle which has so many professionals with relevant professional expertise and extensive relevant experience - more than fifteen months of regular weekly materializations. You understand why no materialist closed minded skeptic or anybody else will not take me on?

*************************

Victor Zammit rebuts Zwinge Randi

J (Zwinge) Randi Attacks Lawyer Victor Zammit – Victor’s Rebuttal : Someone sent me Victor an email that James Zwinge Randi, (hereinafter JZR) had some fifteen articles attacking me. Why is JZR wrong and most unfair and unjust in his attempt to maliciously attack me? Why is he so hugely frustrated, why is he fuming with anger, why is he so venomously aggressive against me and psi experts and gifted mediums? Why does he bother with having the greatest hoax in paranormal history?

1. Failure to beat my challenge. More than seven years ago JZR implied he was going to take me on regarding the ONE MILLION DOLLARS for anyone to show that my objective empirical evidence has no validity. That was over seven years ago, I AM STILL WAITING!! And anything which has not been rebutted will stay valid until it is rebutted. If empirical afterlife evidence cannot be rebutted it will stay valid – permanently. His refusal to even try on his claimed basis that, “You can’t prove the negative” is invalid, illegitimate, unacceptable and worthless – not consistent with the professional rules of debate see below.

2. JZR is allegedly a stage magician – JZR is NOT a scientist, he is not an empiricist, he is not a scholar or an intellectual or a researcher. He has NO formalized learning regarding experimentation. He never had any of his writings referred to by academic scientists or scholars. In fact his conduct shows him to be a conman, a mind-manipulator and someone who himself admits to being highly skilled in deception, trickery and conning. Read full report ....

*****************************

QUESTION OF THE WEEK: (received yesterday) why is it that a mentally queer guy debunker attacked you?

Victor: They attack me through sheer extreme frustration that they have been unable to rebut my empirically elicited objective evidence for the existence of the afterlife. After EIGHT long years – no debunking closed minded skeptic, no scientist, no negative empiricist has been able to show that my expressly stated evidence is invalid. The objective afterlife evidence and the positive results of the gifted mediums are making these debunkers look absolutely stupid and utterly ridiculous! Information came to me that one of the materialist/debunkers – someone I’m informed is called ‘Skunknic’ (?) who blasphemed, and used gutter level language is acting as if he's actually ‘mentally sick.’ – I will not engage with mentally sick people – he needs psychiatric treatment urgently. I’ll rattle his cage if I want to hear from him!

The 'EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.' The negatively minded skeptical experimenter will obtain negative results in psychic experiments notwithstanding other empiricists considered to be 'neutral' obtain positive results doing the same experiments. This is most relevant for those who genuinely want to test gifted psychics. See a most interesting example of the EXPERIMENTER EFFECT > Dr. Marilyn Schlitz neutral experimenter obtained positive results and Dr Richard Wiseman, who has a historical track record of finding against psychics - doing the same experiment as Dr Schlitz consistently obtained negative results - see the the University of Freiburg Studies and Mick O’Neil’s analysis of Wiseman’s experimental style - last time was seen on: http://www.forteantimes.com/artic/espcrit/espcrit.html

Scientific skepticism

" There is no more honourable word in the scientific lexicon that that of 'skeptic' -- one who sincerely seeks after truth and who has the courage to rebut scientific myths and false beliefs with empirical data and sound logic."So begins Richard Milton's excellent article On Skepticism..

Victor Zammit: A Lawyer Rebuts Dr G.M. Woerlee, NDE DebunkerL Anti-afterlife debunker G.M. Woerlee from Holland attempts to debunk Near Death Experiences by way of his book, by what he writes on his website and by the lectures he has given to the skeptics. Initially: what do his works reveal? Read more …

 

-- Victor Zammit, amended February 2008
$1.1 MILLION
CHALLENGE

One million dollars is offered to any closed minded skeptic who can rebut the existing evidence for the afterlife. Read more...

Closed-minded skeptics and other materialists: some of those whom are psychologists, ex-magicians, biologists, physicists and others, have miserably failed to technically rebut the expressly stated evidence for the existence of the afterlife.

By contrast, more scientists, more physicists, more psychologists and more people in the professions and others are conceding the empirical evidence for the afterlife is just irrefutable.

***Victor Zammit has the only $1 million challenge in the world guaranteed by way of a legal document on oath which is subject to up to five years imprisonment if the funding does not exist.

The skeptic with the alleged one million dollar challenge has refused to match my guarantee! An interpretation of this is that he's fooling the public that he has the funding to support the challenge.

SEE MILLION DOLLAR CHALLENGE ON
UTUBE: http://snipurl.com/1ugve

THE closed minded skeptic clock now:

!

The Miami materialist J Zwinge R Clock began in April 2001!! Since then this materialist, closed minded skeptic has refused to rebut my objective evidence for the afterlife. My evidence is EXPRESSLY STATED - 23 areas of evidence for the existence of the afterlife.

CHALLENGE:
to Zwinge Randi: do what Victor Zammit did: formally make out a proper legal written statement on oath (subject to up to seven years in prison if caught lying): that you do in fact have the one million dollars cash you claim you have regarding your alleged $1m challenge. A proviso should be that any applicant will have the right to cite this very important document. Have the courage? Have the dough? 12/12/07

ARTICLES

 

QUESTION: In these extremely difficult financial times, do you still guarantee the one million dollars challenge?

Victor: Absolutely! I have legal documents– unlike that closed minded skeptic from Florida who says he has a million dollars challenge but does not guarantee the funding – my legal document says that I could go to prison for up to five years if I do not have the funding. That is a sworn statement which is subject to statutory law. But the Florida skeptic chose NOT to match my condition. He said he was going to but then changed his mind. Why not? Because to many people, that shows he does not have one million dollars for any challenge - but conclude he has the greatest million dollar hoax in paranormal history!

COMMENTARY: TIME FOR THIS PSI-IGNORANT HARVARD PROFESSOR TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! It is time to take on this uninformed psi-ignorant Harvard Prof Pinker in a serious way. I find it shocking that TIME magazine allowed descriptive – unsubstantiated writings in the endeavor to invalidate the existing irrefutable evidence for psi and the afterlife.

I am more than happy to challenge this professionally uninformed Professor: I will donate half a million dollars to his department if he can show that what we are doing – communicating with afterlife entities in materialization experiments- is not coming from the afterlife dimension – from existing minds outside the physical brain.

Also, he has to rebut the empirical psi evidence validating communicating with inter-dimensional entities.

If he fails, he has to hand over to the Circle of the Silver Cord (seven open-minded skeptical investigators) half a million dollars for their empirical research. It is a matter of telling this reductionist professor who is inexorably lowering the standards of psychology at Harvard to put up or shut up.

Notwithstanding there may be laws regarding ‘betting’ in some countries, we hereinabove are talking about ‘donations.’

I am not at this stage calling this Professor Pinker an intellectual and a morally coward. We’ll see if he has the fortitude to respond!

(The above was sent to the Prof et al 25th January 07).

AN AFTERTHOUGHT: So this Harvard Professor, in a cowardly way writes to TIME magazine to knowingly denigrate, disparage and malign the brilliant paranormal work of those scientists – such as Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Barrett, Sir William Crookes and brilliant researcher/writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle of the old school. He also denigrates the empirical work being done by the Circle of the Silver Cord. This professor exhibits professional ignorance about what is happening in the world to-day in empirically validated communication experiments with afterlife entities. He, like other closed minded skeptics, has NOT done any research at all and rudely spouts his negative prejudice to satisfy his own negative partiality. I call that professional negligence. Will he prove to be a coward or will he show he has the moral courage to stand up for what he wrote against the validity of the paranormal?

***********************

DEPENDENT VARIABLE? When J Zwinge R who claims to have been a stage magician emailed me a couple of years ago he implied that he was qualified to do experiments and test psychics using empirical methods. I tested him by asking him what was a 'dependent variable' in empirical testing. He said he would reply to me. Seven years later, I am still waiting for his answer!!

'The Ultimate Psychic Challenge' was filmed in London recently, early August, in 'London Television Studios.' Zwinge Randi, the notorious closed minded skeptic was caught cheating and trying to deceive and con the public that he was a medium. His performance to cheat, mislead and deceive was so bad, so embarrassing, the producers had to stop the show - this segment edited out, otherwise the show would be perceived as absolute rubbish. Zwinge Randi some are now claiming to be the biggest laughing stock in the history of psychic phenomena - read a report by one of the most incisive psi assessors in the world and who has the highest credibility MONTAGUE KEEN: read more...

A FUNNY WAY ON HOW TO DEBUNK JUST ABOUT ANYTHING
1. Before commencing to debunk, prepare your equipment. Equipment needed: one armchair.
2. Put on the right face. Cultivate a condescending air that suggests that your personal opinions are backed by the full faith and credit of God. Employ vague, subjective, dismissive terms such as ‘ridiculous’ or "trivial" in a manner that suggests they have the full force of scientific authority.
3. Portray science not as an open-ended process of discovery but as a holy war against unruly hordes of quackery- worshipping infidels. Since in war the ends justify the means, you may fudge, stretch or violate the scientific method, or even omit it entirely, in the name of defending the scientific method.
4. Keep your arguments as abstract and theoretical as possible. This will "send the message" that accepted theory overrides any actual evidence that might challenge it--and that therefore no such evidence is worth examining.
5.Reinforce the popular misconception that certain subjects are inherently unscientific. In other words, deliberately confuse the *process* of science with the *content* of science. (Someone may, of course, object that since science is a universal approach to truth-seeking it must be neutral to subject matter; hence, only the investigative *process* can be scientifically responsible or irresponsible. If that happens, dismiss such objections using a method employed successfully by generations of politicians: simply reassure everyone that "there is no contradiction here!"). By Daniel Drasin – he’s is a writer and media producer based in the San Francisco Bay Area.Full report: http://snipurl.com/17que or
http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html

THE 1,000 POUND STERLING CHALLENGE FARCE! Sometime ago some non-entity, he's not a professional, not an investigator, not a medium, not an empiricist, not qualified in any discipline - he's a van driver from England who tried to challenge me when I have a HALF A MILLION DOLLARS challenge to anyone who could show why the Circle of the Silver Cord, inter alia, is not genuine. His challenge was so silly and ridiculous I just gave his stupid 1,000 pounds sterling no time at all – it just fizzled out to nothing. But because the anti-materialization attacker imputed that the members of the Circle of the Silver Cord (COSC) and I are not qualified, for the purpose of informing any new comers to the materialization scene I decided to give information about how qualified the COSC – there are those who were professional law investigators - at least one of them had 20 years intelligence experience, a former police officers, two psychologists with formal qualifications in Scientific Method, a retired attorney with expertise in the admissibility of evidence, a tough journalist, one medium – and others – probably the most professional materialization investigation group in the history of empirical materializations. Read more about this uninformed skeptic ...

BREAKING THE HOUDINI CODE: What evidence is there to show that Houdini transmitted the agreed code from the afterlife to his wife?


Victor: Houdini was a crusader against fake mediums early last century – but vowed that if there is an afterlife, on crossing over he would transmit a message by way of a code to his wife Beatrice. And the agreed code did come through! There were a number of people present including reporters from “The Scientific American”, Houdini’s wife and other witnesses. Houdini’s code word related from the afterlife was BELIEVE – as you will read in the article, it was a rather complex message. And the code word from Houdini’s mother related from the afterlife was ‘FORGIVE’. Houdini’s wife Beatrice stated that no one else in the world knew about the code. She signed a formal statement to the effect that the code came from Houdini and was absolutely correct. Naturally the closed minded, aggressive skeptics went on a rampage, using violent tactics to claim that Beatrice was lying and the medium was fraudulent. But to no avail. Houdini’s wife Beatrice stood by what she experienced. ... Read more... (The latest: At the moment, there is a private committee in the United States trying to investigate his cause of death in the 1920's - even trying to exhume his body -- one of the skeptical debunkers claiming he was poisoned by the 'Spiritualists' - and even very naively trying to blame Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for his murder!!!!!)

 

Copyright © 2001 Victor Zammit.  All rights reserved.  --