A lawyer rebuts the giants of materialist science and negative empiricists - psychologists and other skeptics:

A SEPARATE - $500.000 OFFER TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! Half a million dollars is being offered by my sponsors to anyone to duplicate our materializations results - not only to the debunkers and other materialists, but the offer is open to the most advanced scientists and anybody else in the world to-day . But if they they fail, a legal requirement is that they will have to hand over half a million dollars to the Circle of the Silver Cord. After eighteen long months, no materialist genius, no scientist, no physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no debunker has been able to rebut the most important afterlife evidence in human history. Got the motivation? Got the courage? Got the stomach for it? I'M WAITING FOR YOU!!!

*************************

Victor Zammit rebuts Zwinge Randi

J (Zwinge) Randi Attacks Lawyer Victor Zammit – Victor’s Rebuttal : Someone sent me Victor an email that James Zwinge Randi, (hereinafter JZR) had some fifteen articles attacking me. Why is JZR wrong and most unfair and unjust in his attempt to maliciously attack me? Why is he so hugely frustrated, why is he fuming with anger, why is he so venomously aggressive against me and psi experts and gifted mediums? Why does he bother with having the greatest hoax in paranormal history?

1. Failure to beat my challenge. More than seven years ago JZR implied he was going to take me on regarding the ONE MILLION DOLLARS for anyone to show that my objective empirical evidence has no validity. That was over seven years ago, I AM STILL WAITING!! And anything which has not been rebutted will stay valid until it is rebutted. If empirical afterlife evidence cannot be rebutted it will stay valid – permanently. His refusal to even try on his claimed basis that, “You can’t prove the negative” is invalid, illegitimate, unacceptable and worthless – not consistent with the professional rules of debate see below.

2. JZR is allegedly a stage magician – JZR is NOT a scientist, he is not an empiricist, he is not a scholar or an intellectual or a researcher. He has NO formalized learning regarding experimentation. He never had any of his writings referred to by academic scientists or scholars. In fact his conduct shows him to be a conman, a mind-manipulator and someone who himself admits to being highly skilled in deception, trickery and conning. Read full report ....

*****************************

QUESTION OF THE WEEK: (received yesterday) why is it that a mentally queer guy debunker attacked you?

Victor: They attack me through sheer extreme frustration that they have been unable to rebut my empirically elicited objective evidence for the existence of the afterlife. After EIGHT long years – no debunking closed minded skeptic, no scientist, no negative empiricist has been able to show that my expressly stated evidence is invalid. The objective afterlife evidence and the positive results of the gifted mediums are making these debunkers look absolutely stupid and utterly ridiculous! Information came to me that one of the materialist/debunkers – someone I’m informed is called ‘Skunknic’ (?) who blasphemed, and used gutter level language is acting as if he's actually ‘mentally sick.’ I’m informed he keeps calling himself, “idiot, moron, jackass, fool, buffoon, nitwit, hayseed, nincompoop, muck for brains, nitcompoop, jerk, airhead, blockhead, maroon, toon and twit.” – And they’re NOT his bad points - so I’m informed! I will not engage with mentally sick people – he needs psychiatric treatment urgently. I’ll rattle his cage if I want to hear from him!

The 'EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.' The negatively minded skeptical experimenter will obtain negative results in psychic experiments notwithstanding other empiricists considered to be 'neutral' obtain positive results doing the same experiments. This is most relevant for those who genuinely want to test gifted psychics. See a most interesting example of the EXPERIMENTER EFFECT > Dr. Marilyn Schlitz neutral experimenter obtained positive results and Dr Richard Wiseman, who has a historical track record of finding against psychics - doing the same experiment as Dr Schlitz consistently obtained negative results - see the the University of Freiburg Studies and Mick O’Neil’s analysis of Wiseman’s experimental style - last time was seen on: http://www.forteantimes.com/artic/espcrit/espcrit.html

Scientific skepticism

" There is no more honourable word in the scientific lexicon that that of 'skeptic' -- one who sincerely seeks after truth and who has the courage to rebut scientific myths and false beliefs with empirical data and sound logic."

So begins Richard Milton's excellent article On Skepticism.

ABSOLUTE EMPIRICAL PROOF OF PRECOGNITION! AGAIN CLOSED MINDED SKEPTICS FAIL TO REBUT....

In the laboratory, comparisons (meta-analysis) of 309 studies of precognition (telling the future) in the laboratory have demonstrated that the subjects showed their ability to see the future against odds of TEN MILLION BILLION BILLION to ONE that they could have done it by chance. This INEVITABLY means that the information did NOT come by chance and that psychic phenomenon of recognition is real, repeatable and testable! See Dean Radin’s CONSCIOUS UNIVERSE 114. I've asked the materialists to rebut these experiments - funny how materialists, closed minded skeptics CANNOT cope with 'scientific' proof or with those who have the skills to present empirical evidence for psi/afterlife evidence.

Victor Zammit: A Lawyer Rebuts Dr G.M. Woerlee, NDE DebunkerL Anti-afterlife debunker G.M. Woerlee from Holland attempts to debunk Near Death Experiences by way of his book, by what he writes on his website and by the lectures he has given to the skeptics. Initially: what do his works reveal? Read more …

-- Victor Zammit, amended February 2008

SEE MILLION DOLLAR CHALLENGE ON
UTUBE: http://snipurl.com/1ugve

THE closed minded skeptic clock now:

The Miami materialist J Zwinge R Clock began in April 2001!! Since then this materialist, closed minded skeptic has refused to rebut my objective evidence for the afterlife. My evidence is EXPRESSLY STATED - 23 areas of evidence for the existence of the afterlife.

CHALLENGE:
to Zwinge Randi: do what Victor Zammit did: formally make out a proper legal written statement on oath (subject to up to seven years in prison if caught lying): that you do in fact have the one million dollars cash you claim you have regarding your alleged $1m challenge. A proviso should be that any applicant will have the right to cite this very important document. Have the courage? Have the dough? 12/12/07

COMMENTARY: TIME FOR THIS PSI-IGNORANT HARVARD PROFESSOR TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP! It is time to take on this uninformed psi-ignorant Harvard Prof Pinker in a serious way. I find it shocking that TIME magazine allowed descriptive – unsubstantiated writings in the endeavor to invalidate the existing irrefutable evidence for psi and the afterlife.

I am more than happy to challenge this professionally uninformed Professor: I will donate half a million dollars to his department if he can show that what we are doing – communicating with afterlife entities in materialization experiments- is not coming from the afterlife dimension – from existing minds outside the physical brain.

Also, he has to rebut the empirical psi evidence validating communicating with inter-dimensional entities.

If he fails, he has to hand over to the Circle of the Silver Cord (seven open-minded skeptical investigators) half a million dollars for their empirical research. It is a matter of telling this reductionist professor who is inexorably lowering the standards of psychology at Harvard to put up or shut up.

Notwithstanding there may be laws regarding ‘betting’ in some countries, we hereinabove are talking about ‘donations.’

I am not at this stage calling this Professor Pinker an intellectual and a morally coward. We’ll see if he has the fortitude to respond!

(The above was sent to the Prof et al 25th January 07).

AN AFTERTHOUGHT: So this Harvard Professor, in a cowardly way writes to TIME magazine to knowingly denigrate, disparage and malign the brilliant paranormal work of those scientists – such as Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Barrett, Sir William Crookes and brilliant researcher/writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle of the old school. He also denigrates the empirical work being done by the Circle of the Silver Cord. This professor exhibits professional ignorance about what is happening in the world to-day in empirically validated communication experiments with afterlife entities. He, like other closed minded skeptics, has NOT done any research at all and rudely spouts his negative prejudice to satisfy his own negative partiality. I call that professional negligence. Will he prove to be a coward or will he show he has the moral courage to stand up for what he wrote against the validity of the paranormal?

***********************

DEPENDENT VARIABLE? When J Zwinge R who claims to have been a stage magician emailed me a couple of years ago he implied that he was qualified to do experiments and test psychics using empirical methods. I tested him by asking him what was a 'dependent variable' in empirical testing. He said he would reply to me. Four years later, I am still waiting for his answer!!!!!!

'The Ultimate Psychic Challenge' was filmed in London recently, early August, in 'London Television Studios.' Zwinge Randi, the notorious closed minded skeptic was caught cheating and trying to deceive and con the public that he was a medium. His performance to cheat, mislead and deceive was so bad, so embarrassing, the producers had to stop the show - this segment edited out, otherwise the show would be perceived as absolute rubbish. Zwinge Randi some are now claiming to be the biggest laughing stock in the history of psychic phenomena - read a report by one of the most incisive psi assessors in the world and who has the highest credibility MONTAGUE KEEN: read more...

A FUNNY WAY ON HOW TO DEBUNK JUST ABOUT ANYTHING
1. Before commencing to debunk, prepare your equipment. Equipment needed: one armchair.
2. Put on the right face. Cultivate a condescending air that suggests that your personal opinions are backed by the full faith and credit of God. Employ vague, subjective, dismissive terms such as ‘ridiculous’ or "trivial" in a manner that suggests they have the full force of scientific authority.
3. Portray science not as an open-ended process of discovery but as a holy war against unruly hordes of quackery- worshipping infidels. Since in war the ends justify the means, you may fudge, stretch or violate the scientific method, or even omit it entirely, in the name of defending the scientific method.
4. Keep your arguments as abstract and theoretical as possible. This will "send the message" that accepted theory overrides any actual evidence that might challenge it--and that therefore no such evidence is worth examining.
5.Reinforce the popular misconception that certain subjects are inherently unscientific. In other words, deliberately confuse the *process* of science with the *content* of science. (Someone may, of course, object that since science is a universal approach to truth-seeking it must be neutral to subject matter; hence, only the investigative *process* can be scientifically responsible or irresponsible. If that happens, dismiss such objections using a method employed successfully by generations of politicians: simply reassure everyone that "there is no contradiction here!"). By Daniel Drasin – he’s is a writer and media producer based in the San Francisco Bay Area.Full report: http://snipurl.com/17que or
http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html

ANOTHER BUMBLING DEBUNKER 'NOT LOUIS ARMSTRONG': DON’T BE MISLEAD BY THE UNINFORMED - Michael Pisspot - so, you want to attack Victor - who has never done anything to you! Michael Pisspot is an enemy of David Thompson’s materializations – and he does it again - writing a lot of nonsense – considering he claims he is a fiction writer – where he truly belongs- FICTION! Don't be misguided by this guy who shows he knows NOTHING about materializations, shows he knows NOTHING about jazz music. This uninformed layman (what’s he going to lay? David asks) skeptic wrote that because Louis Armstrong played trumpet, then it could not have been Louis Armstrong - in one of David Thompson’s materializations in England recently! WRONG! Why? I was in jazz music in my late teens and although tenor saxophone was my main instrument – I also played alto and baritone saxophones, C flute and B flat clarinet at professional level. Once you are a wind-instrument musician and know improvisation, then you can play virtually any wind instrument if one practices that instrument even for a few weeks. Harmonica is one of the simplest instruments to play.Now, Michael PISSPOTT– just because you show you are an enemy of David Thompson’s materializations - don’t pick on things you show you know nothing about – go back to writing FICTION and leave empirical investigations to us!